Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37025501›Full record

ArticleCurrent treatment options in neurology2022

Mass Spectrometry-Based Approaches for Clinical Biomarker Discovery in Traumatic Brain Injury.

Matthew Creech, Lindsey Carvalho, Heather McCoy, Jon Jacobs, H E Hinson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current treatment options in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew CreechDepartment of Neurology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland OR.
Lindsey CarvalhoDepartment of Neurology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland OR.
Heather McCoyBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratories, Richland, WA.
Jon JacobsBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratories, Richland, WA.
H E HinsonDepartment of Neurology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland OR.
Oregon Health & Science University · USPacific Northwest National Laboratory · US

Funding

Equipment Supplement Request for a Research Resource for Ultra-sensitive High Throughput ProteomicsP41GM103493 · NIGMS · BATTELLE PACIFIC NORTHWEST LABORATORIES · PI KELLY, RYAN T · 2012 to 2022
$22.6M
Predictors of Low-risk Phenotypes after Traumatic Brain Injury Incorporating Proteomic Biomarker Signatures.K23NS110828 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HINSON, HOLLY ELAINE · 2020 to 2024
$1.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103493NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS110828
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose of Review: Precision treatments to address the multifaceted pathophysiology of traumatic brain injury (TBI) are desperately needed, which has led to the intense study of fluid-based protein biomarkers in TBI. Mass Spectrometry (MS) is increasingly being applied to biomarker discovery and quantification in neurological disease to explore the proteome, allowing for more flexibility in biomarker discovery than commonly encountered antibody-based assays. In this narrative review, we will provide specific examples of how MS technology has advanced translational research in traumatic brain injury (TBI) focusing on clinical studies, and looking ahead to promising emerging applications of MS to the field of Neurocritical Care. Recent Findings: Proteomic biomarker discovery using MS technology in human subjects has included the full range of injury severity in TBI, though critically ill patients can offer more options to biofluids given the need for invasive monitoring. Blood, urine, cerebrospinal fluid, brain specimens, and cerebral extracellular fluid have all been sources for analysis. Emerging evidence suggests there are distinct proteomic profiles in radiographic TBI subtypes, and that biomarkers may be used to distinguish patients sustaining TBI from healthy controls. Metabolomics may offer a window into the perturbations of ongoing cerebral insults in critically ill patients after severe TBI. Summary: Emerging MS technologies may offer biomarker discovery and validation opportunities not afforded by conventional means due to its ability to handle the complexities associated with the proteome. While MS techniques are relatively early in development in the neurosciences space, the potential applications to TBI and neurocritical care are likely to accelerate in the coming decade.

Indexed as

biomarkermass spectrometryproteomicstraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID37025501
PMCPMC10072855
OpenAlexW4297051630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.