Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37025474›Full record

ArticleBJUI compass2023

Hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy with mitomycin-C for the treatment of high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients.

Samantha Conroy, Karl Pang, Ibrahim Jubber, Syed A Hussain, Derek J Rosario, Marcus G Cumberbatch, James W F Catto, Aidan P Noon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJUI compass, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Device-Assisted Therapy in Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Samantha ConroyAcademic Urology Unit, Department of Oncology and Metabolism University of Sheffield Sheffield UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7167-4908
Karl PangAcademic Urology Unit, Department of Oncology and Metabolism University of Sheffield Sheffield UK.
Ibrahim JubberAcademic Urology Unit, Department of Oncology and Metabolism University of Sheffield Sheffield UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4558-2521
Syed A HussainAcademic Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology and Metabolism University of Sheffield Sheffield UK.
Derek J RosarioDepartment of Urology Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Sheffield UK.
Marcus G CumberbatchAcademic Urology Unit, Department of Oncology and Metabolism University of Sheffield Sheffield UK.
James W F CattoAcademic Urology Unit, Department of Oncology and Metabolism University of Sheffield Sheffield UK.
Aidan P NoonDepartment of Urology Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Sheffield UK.
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The objectives of the study are to explore tolerability, acceptability and oncological outcomes for patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) treated with hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy (HIVEC) and mitomycin-C (MMC) at our institution. Patients and Methods: Our single-institution, observational study consists of consecutive high-risk NMIBC patients treated with HIVEC and MMC. Our HIVEC protocol included six weekly instillations (induction), followed by two further cycles of three instillations (maintenance) (6 + 3 + 3) if there was cystoscopic response. Patient demographics, instillation dates and adverse events (AEs) were collected prospectively in our dedicated HIVEC clinic. Retrospective case-note review was performed to evaluate oncological outcomes. Primary outcomes were tolerability and acceptability of HIVEC protocol; secondary outcomes were 12-month recurrence-free, progression-free and overall survival. Results: In total, 57 patients (median age 80.3 years) received HIVEC and MMC, with a median follow-up of 18 months. Of these, 40 (70.2%) had recurrent tumours, and 29 (50.9%) had received prior Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG). HIVEC induction was completed by 47 (82.5%) patients, but only 19 (33.3%) completed the full protocol. Disease recurrence (28.9%) and AEs (28.9%) were the most common reasons for incompletion of protocol; five (13.2%) patients stopped treatment due to logistical challenges. AEs occurred in 20 (35.1%) patients; the most frequently documented were rash (10.5%), urinary tract infection (8.8%) and bladder spasm (8.8%). Progression during treatment occurred in 11 (19.3%) patients, 4 (7.0%) of whom had muscle invasion and 5 (8.8%) subsequently required radical treatment. Patients who had received prior BCG were significantly more likely to progress ( Conclusions: Our single-institution experience suggests that HIVEC and MMC are tolerable and acceptable. Oncological outcomes in this predominantly elderly, pretreated cohort are promising; however, disease progression was higher in patients pretreated with BCG. Further randomised noninferiority trials comparing HIVEC versus BCG in high-risk NMIBC are required.

Indexed as

acceptabilityhigh riskhyperthermic intravesical chemotherapyintravesical treatmentmitomycin Cnon‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancertolerability

Identifiers

PMID37025474
PMCPMC10071075
OpenAlexW4310545011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.