Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37025458›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2023

Qualitative and quantitative evidence of motivation states for physical activity, exercise and being sedentary from university student focus groups.

Matthew A Stults-Kolehmainen, Todd A Gilson, Nicholas SantaBarbara, Paul C McKee, Rajita Sinha, John B Bartholomew, Daniel Boullosa, Christopher J Budnick, Fabio Amador Bueno, Adrian Haughton and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Matthew A Stults-KolehmainenDigestive Health Multispecialty Clinic, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, United States.
Todd A GilsonDepartment of Kinesiology and Physical Education, Northern Illinois University, Dekalb, IL, United States.
Nicholas SantaBarbaraDepartment of Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, Merrimack College, North Andover, MA, United States.
Paul C McKeeCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Rajita SinhaYale Stress Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.
John B BartholomewDepartment of Kinesiology and Health Education, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.
Daniel BoullosaFaculty of Physical Activity and Sports Sciences, Universidad de León, León, Spain.
Christopher J BudnickDepartment of Psychology, Southern Connecticut State University, New Haven, CT, United States.
Fabio Amador BuenoConnecticut Community Colleges Nursing Program, Gateway Community College, New Haven, CT, United States.
Adrian HaughtonCenter for Medical Informatics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.
Jessica L BarkerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Garrett I AshCenter for Medical Informatics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation for physical activity and sedentary behaviors (e.g., desires, urges, wants, cravings) varies from moment to moment. According to the WANT model, these motivation states may be affectively-charged (e.g., felt as tension), particularly after periods of maximal exercise or extended rest. The purpose of this study was to examine postulates of the WANT model utilizing a mixed-methods approach. We hypothesized that: (1) qualitative evidence would emerge from interviews to support this model, and (2) motivation states would quantitatively change over the course of an interview period. Seventeen undergraduate students (mean age = 18.6y, 13 women) engaged in focus groups where 12 structured questions were presented. Participants completed the "right now" version of the CRAVE scale before and after interviews. Qualitative data were analyzed with content analysis. A total of 410 unique lower-order themes were classified and grouped into 43 higher order themes (HOTs). From HOTs, six super higher order themes (SHOTs) were designated: (1) wants and aversions, (2) change and stability, (3) autonomy and automaticity, (4) objectives and impulses, (5) restraining and propelling forces, and (6) stress and boredom. Participants stated that they experienced desires to move and rest, including during the interview, but these states changed rapidly and varied both randomly as well as systematically across periods of minutes to months. Some also described a total absence of desire or even aversion to move and rest. Of note, strong urges and cravings for movement, typically from conditions of deprivation (e.g., sudden withdrawal from exercise training) were associated with physical and mental manifestations, such as fidgeting and feeling restless. Urges were often consummated with behavior (e.g., exercise sessions, naps), which commonly resulted in satiation and subsequent drop in desire. Importantly, stress was frequently described as both an inhibitor and instigator of motivation states. CRAVE-Move increased pre-to-post interviews (

Indexed as

desiresexercisefocus groupsmotivationmotivation statesphysical activityqualitative studystress

Identifiers

PMID37025458
PMCPMC10071436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.