Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37025346›Full record

ArticleIJID regions2023

Does ChAdOx1-S and BNT162b2 heterologous prime-boost vaccination trigger higher rates of vaccine-related adverse events?

Alhan Haji, Abdallah Alkattan, Nagla Mahmoud, Elfadil Elkagam, Mustafa Hassanein, Amal Alfaifi, Jaffar A Al-Tawfiq, Khaled Alabdulkareem, Hani Jokhdar, Nashwa Radwan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IJID regions, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Alhan HajiDepartment of Training, Research and Development, Assisting Deputyship for Primary Health Care, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdallah AlkattanDepartment of Research and Development, General Directorate of School Health, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Nagla MahmoudDepartment of Training, Research and Development, Assisting Deputyship for Primary Health Care, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Elfadil ElkagamDepartment of Training, Research and Development, Assisting Deputyship for Primary Health Care, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mustafa HassaneinDepartment of Training, Research and Development, Assisting Deputyship for Primary Health Care, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Amal AlfaifiDepartment of Training, Research and Development, Assisting Deputyship for Primary Health Care, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Jaffar A Al-TawfiqSpecialty Internal Medicine and Quality Patient Safety Department, Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.
Khaled AlabdulkareemDepartment of Training, Research and Development, Assisting Deputyship for Primary Health Care, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Hani JokhdarDeputyship of Public Health, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Nashwa RadwanDepartment of Training, Research and Development, Assisting Deputyship for Primary Health Care, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ministry of Health · SAImam Mohammad ibn Saud Islamic University · SAJohns Hopkins University · USMinistry of Health · BHTanta University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There has been significant international interest in heterologous prime-boost COVID-19 vaccination. However, it is linked with different intensity and frequency of adverse events. This study aimed to assess the safety of ChAdOx1-S and BNT162b2 vaccines when given as heterologous prime-boost vaccination in Saudi Arabia. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted during the period October 2021 to March 2022. The study included two groups of people based on the type of vaccination regimen. The first group (heterologous) was subjected to different prime-boost vaccination schedules irrespective of the prime and boost vaccine types. The second group included people vaccinated with the same type of COVID-19 vaccine (homologous). Results: The overall sample included 334 participants. Those included in the heterologous group were at about 1.5 fold -increased risk for developing local and systemic adverse events compared to the homologous group. Fever, headache, and vomiting were significantly more frequent among the heterologous group compared to the homologous group (p-value<0.05). In both groups, more than half of the recorded adverse events were mild/moderate in severity. Conclusion: Heterologous prime-post vaccination is associated with a slightly increased risk for the development of local and systemic adverse events compared to the homologous regimen. However, most of these adverse events are mild/moderate in nature and recede within two days with no serious adverse events documented.

Indexed as

Adverse eventsCOVID-19 vaccinationHeterologousHomologousPrime-post vaccination

Identifiers

PMID37025346
PMCPMC10005969
OpenAlexW4323925201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.