Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37025276›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied statistics2023

Prediction models with graph kernel regularization for network data.

Jie Liu, Haojie Chen, Yang Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied statistics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jie LiuInternational Institute of Finance, School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, People's Republic of China.
Haojie ChenInternational Institute of Finance, School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, People's Republic of China.
Yang YangSchool of Statistics and Mathematics, Nanjing Audit University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional regression methods typically consider only covariate information and assume that the observations are mutually independent samples. However, samples usually come from individuals connected by a network in many modern applications. We present a risk minimization formulation for learning from both covariates and network structure in the context of graph kernel regularization. The formulation involves a loss function with a penalty term. This penalty can be used not only to encourage similarity between linked nodes but also lead to improvement over traditional regression models. Furthermore, the penalty can be used with many loss-based predictive methods, such as linear regression with squared loss and logistic regression with log-likelihood loss. Simulations to evaluate the performance of this model in the cases of low dimensions and high dimensions show that our proposed approach outperforms all other benchmarks. We verify this for uniform graph, nonuniform graph, balanced-sample, and unbalanced-sample datasets. The approach was applied to predicting the response values on a 'follow' social network of Tencent Weibo users and on two citation networks (Cora and CiteSeer). Each instance verifies that the proposed method combining covariate information and link structure with the graph kernel regularization can improve predictive performance.

Indexed as

Graph regularizationkernel functionnode effectpredictionregression

Identifiers

PMID37025276
PMCPMC10071950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.