Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37025141›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2023

An advanced deep learning models-based plant disease detection: A review of recent research.

Muhammad Shoaib, Babar Shah, Shaker Ei-Sappagh, Akhtar Ali, Asad Ullah, Fayadh Alenezi, Tsanko Gechev, Tariq Hussain, Farman Ali

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 80 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed
159.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 401 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.

Muhammad ShoaibDepartment of Computer Science, CECOS University of IT and Emerging Sciences, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Babar ShahCollege of Technological Innovation, Zayed University, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Shaker Ei-SappaghFaculty of Computer Science and Engineering, Galala University, Suez, Egypt.
Akhtar AliDepartment of Molecular Stress Physiology, Center of Plant Systems Biology and Biotechnology, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Asad UllahDepartment of Computer Science and Information Technology, Sarhad University of Science and Information Technology, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Fayadh AleneziDepartment of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering, Jouf University, Jouf, Saudi Arabia.
Tsanko GechevDepartment of Molecular Stress Physiology, Center of Plant Systems Biology and Biotechnology, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Tariq HussainSchool of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou, China.
Farman AliDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, School of Convergence, College of Computing and Informatics, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Center of Plant Systems Biology and Biotechnology · BGSarhad University of Science and Information Technology · PKAl Jouf University · SAGalala UniversitySejong University · KRZayed University · AEZhejiang Gongshang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants play a crucial role in supplying food globally. Various environmental factors lead to plant diseases which results in significant production losses. However, manual detection of plant diseases is a time-consuming and error-prone process. It can be an unreliable method of identifying and preventing the spread of plant diseases. Adopting advanced technologies such as Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) can help to overcome these challenges by enabling early identification of plant diseases. In this paper, the recent advancements in the use of ML and DL techniques for the identification of plant diseases are explored. The research focuses on publications between 2015 and 2022, and the experiments discussed in this study demonstrate the effectiveness of using these techniques in improving the accuracy and efficiency of plant disease detection. This study also addresses the challenges and limitations associated with using ML and DL for plant disease identification, such as issues with data availability, imaging quality, and the differentiation between healthy and diseased plants. The research provides valuable insights for plant disease detection researchers, practitioners, and industry professionals by offering solutions to these challenges and limitations, providing a comprehensive understanding of the current state of research in this field, highlighting the benefits and limitations of these methods, and proposing potential solutions to overcome the challenges of their implementation.

Indexed as

convolutional neural networksdeep learningimage processingmachine learningperformance evaluationplant disease detectionpractical applications

Identifiers

PMID37025141
PMCPMC10070872
OpenAlexW4328115538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.