ReviewOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2023
Comparison of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Versus Without Anterolateral Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Review in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Femoral and tibial attachment positions of the anterolateral ligament graft are associated with anterior instability after combined anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral ligament reconstruction.Knee surgery & related research · 2026Article
- Type I Atelocollagen Interposition Within the ACL Graft During ACL Reconstruction: An Exploratory Clinical and MRI-Based Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Using Hamstring Autografts: A Detailed Surgical Technique.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Combined ACL and ALL Reconstruction Using Allografts as the ACL Graft Source Reduces Surgical Failure and Improves Graft Maturity Compared with Isolated ACL Reconstruction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Role of lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) in anterior cruciate ligament-injured athletes.Annals of joint · 2026Review
- Higher graft failure rates following primary ACL reconstruction and conservative MCL treatment compared to simultaneous primary ACL and MCL reconstruction: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Optimal Knee Flexion Angle for ACL Femoral Tunnel Drilling and ALL Femoral Tunnel Orientation in Combined ACL and ALL Reconstruction: 3D Simulation Study.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Gracilis Anatomic Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction: Technical Note.Arthroscopy techniques · 2025Article
- All-Arthroscopic Segond Fracture Fixation in Association With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair.Arthroscopy techniques · 2025Article
- Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis Notably Reduced Residual Knee Instability and Anterior Tibial Translation in Patients With an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Combined With a High-Grade Pivot-Shift Phenomenon.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament Arthroscopic Reconstruction and Lateral Tenodesis Using Iliotibial Band Augmented With Gracilis Tendon.Arthroscopy techniques · 2025Article
- Optimal Anterolateral Ligament Tibial Tunnel Orientation to Prevent ACL Tunnel Collision and Saphenous Nerve Injury.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Spin is Prevalent in Abstracts of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses of Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction and Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2025Review
- Lateral extra-articular procedures combined with ACL reconstructions lead to a higher return to pre-injury level of sport: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Greater return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction combined with anterolateral ligament reconstruction compared with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction alone: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Review
- Long-term Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With 3 Different Surgical Techniques: A Prospective Randomized Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation at a Minimum of 20 Years' Follow-up.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Practice Patterns and Return-to-Sports Timing of National Football League Head Team Physicians for ACL Reconstruction.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2024Article
- Trends in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Techniques and Postoperative Care Among Leaders in the Field: A Survey of the Herodicus Society.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2024Article
- Review
- Addition of anterolateral ligament reconstruction to primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction could benefit recovery of functional outcomes.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: It is clear that the anterolateral ligament has an important role in rotational knee stability. However, whether patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) can benefit from anterolateral augmentation (ALA) is still controversial. Purpose: To compare the effects of isolated ACLR versus ACLR combined with ALA (ACLR+ALA) on clinical outcomes and knee stability. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: The methodology followed PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A literature search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials databases was undertaken to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing isolated ACLR with ACLR+ALA for the treatment of ACL injuries in the last 15 years. The Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias tool and the revised Jadad scale were utilized by 2 independent reviewers to determine the quality of RCTs. Relevant data were extracted and compared between procedures, and heterogeneity across the RCTs was assessed using the Results: The initial search yielded 849 articles. A total of 14 studies (1850 patients; 941 ACLR and 909 ACLR+ALA) satisfied the eligibility criteria for the meta-analysis. There were no significant differences between the procedures in terms of patient-reported outcomes (International Knee Documentation Committee score, Tegner score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) or return-to-sport rates. However, patients who underwent ACLR+ALA had better knee stability based on the pivot-shift test (risk ratio [RR], 1.06 [95% CI, 1.02 to 1.10]; Conclusion: ALA can be considered as a reinforcement of ACLR to improve anteroposterior and anterolateral rotational stability of the knee and reduce the risk of failure. The patient-reported outcomes of isolated ACLR were similar to those of ACLR+ALA, and both procedures provided improved knee function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.