Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37025118›Full record

ArticleJTO clinical and research reports2023

Brief Report: Prognostic Relevance of 3q Amplification in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung.

Fawzi Abu Rous, Pin Li, Shannon Carskadon, Sunny Rk Singh, Rebecca Chacko, Hassan Abushukair, Shirish Gadgeel, Nallasivam Palanisamy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JTO clinical and research reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fawzi Abu RousDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan.
Pin LiDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan.
Shannon CarskadonDepartment of Urology, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan.
Sunny Rk SinghDepartment of Hematology-Oncology, The University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Rebecca ChackoDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan.
Hassan AbushukairFaculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Ar-Ramtha, Jordan.
Shirish GadgeelDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan.
Nallasivam PalanisamyDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Amplification of 3q is the most common genetic alteration identified in squamous cell carcinoma of the lung (LUSC), with the most frequent amplified region being 3q26 to 3q28. Methods: In this analysis, we aim to describe the prognostic relevance of 3q amplification by focusing on a minimal common region (MCR) of amplification constituted of 25 genes. We analyzed 511 cases of LUSC from The Cancer Genome Atlas and included 476 in the final analysis. Results: We identified a 25-gene MCR that was amplified in 221 (44.3%) cases and was associated with better disease-specific survival (not reported [NR] versus 9.25 y, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.24-NR, log-rank Conclusions: Amplification of the 25-gene MCR within 3q was present in 44% of this cohort, consisting mainly of Caucasian patients with early stage LUSC. This analysis strongly indicates the prognostic relevance of the 25-gene MCR within 3q. We are further evaluating its prognostic and predictive relevance in a racially diverse patient population with advanced LUSC.

Indexed as

3qAmplificationBiomarkerNSCLCSquamous cell carcinoma of the lung

Identifiers

PMID37025118
PMCPMC10070899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.