Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37024972›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2023

Developing and testing the usability, acceptability, and future implementation of the Whole Day Matters Tool and User Guide for primary care providers using think-aloud, near-live, and interview procedures.

Tamara L Morgan, Jensen Pletch, Emma Faught, Michelle S Fortier, Mary Kate Gazendam, Kelly Howse, Rahul Jain, Kirstin N Lane, Kaleigh Maclaren, Taylor McFadden and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Exploring occupational therapists' use of movement guidelines for young children with disabilities.Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Tamara L MorganSchool of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University, 28 Division Street, Kingston, ON, Canada. t.morgan@queensu.ca.
Jensen PletchSchool of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University, 28 Division Street, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Emma FaughtSchool of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Michelle S FortierSchool of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Mary Kate GazendamLoyalist Family Health Team, Amherstview, ON, Canada.
Kelly HowseSchool of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Rahul JainTemerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kirstin N LaneCanadian Society for Exercise Physiology, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Kaleigh MaclarenIndependent Communication Specialist, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Taylor McFaddenCanadian Medical Association, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Jeanette C ProrokCanadian Frailty Network, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Zachary J WestonCanadian Society for Exercise Physiology, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Jennifer R TomasoneSchool of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University, 28 Division Street, Kingston, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCanada's 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for Adults have shifted the focus from considering movement behaviours (i.e., physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep) separately to a 24-h paradigm, which considers how they are integrated. Accordingly, primary care providers (PCPs) have the opportunity to improve their practice to promote all movement behaviours cohesively. However, PCPs have faced barriers to discussing physical activity alone (e.g., time, competing priorities, inadequate training), leading to low frequency of physical activity discussions. Consequently, discussing three movement behaviours may seem challenging. Tools to facilitate primary care discussions about physical activity have been developed and used; however, few have undergone usability testing and none have integrated all movement behaviours. Following a synthesis of physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep tools for PCPs, we developed the Whole Day Matters Tool and User Guide that incorporate all movement behaviours. The present study aimed to explore PCPs' perceptions on the usability, acceptability, and future implementation of the Whole Day Matters Tool and User Guide to improve their relevancy among PCPs.

methodsTwenty-six PCPs were observed and audio-video recorded while using the Tool and User Guide in a think-aloud procedure, then in a near-live encounter with a mock service-user. A debriefing interview using a guide informed by Normalization Process Theory followed. Recordings were transcribed verbatim and analysed using content analysis and a critical friend to enhance rigour.

resultsPCPs valued aspects of the Tool and User Guide including their structure, user-friendliness, visual appeal, and multi-behaviour focus and suggested modifications to improve usability and acceptability. Findings are further discussed in the context of Normalization Process Theory and previous literature.

conclusionsThe Tool and User Guide were revised, including adding plain language, reordering and renaming sections, reducing text, and clarifying instructions. Results also informed the addition of a Preamble and a Handout for adults accessing care (i.e., patients/clients/service-users) to explain the evidence underpinning the 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for Adults and support a person-centered approach. These four resources (i.e., Tool, User Guide, Preamble, Handout) have since undergone a consensus building process to arrive at their final versions before being disseminated into primary care practice.

Indexed as

ExerciseSedentary BehaviorAdultConsensusHumansPrimary Health CareSleep24-Hour Movement GuidelinesIntegrated knowledge translationLifestyle medicineNear-livePreventionPrimary careQualitative researchThink-aloud

Identifiers

PMID37024972
PMCPMC10080928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.