ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2023
Optimizing prognostic factors of five-year survival in gastric cancer patients using feature selection techniques with machine learning algorithms: a comparative study.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparison of machine learning methods versus traditional Cox regression for survival prediction in cancer using real-world data: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Pooled it
- Machine learning approaches in the therapeutic outcome prediction in major depressive disorder: a systematic review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- Machine Learning-Based Survival Prediction Models for Young Patients With Gastric Cancer: Model Development and Validation Study.JMIR cancer · 2026Article
- Multidimensional cfRNA response modeling identifies a 5-gene pair signature for high-robust pulmonary tuberculosis diagnosis.iScience · 2026Article
- Development and validation of an explainable machine learning-based risk prediction model for obesity in Chinese children and adolescents: a population-based study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Machine learning to evaluate the effects of non-clinical social determinant features in predicting colorectal Cancer mortality in a medically underserved Appalachian population.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Predicting gastric cancer survival using machine learning: A systematic review.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Survival prediction from imbalanced colorectal cancer dataset using hybrid sampling methods and tree-based classifiers.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Cadonilimab combined with trastuzumab and chemotherapy for HER2-positive gastric cancer with bone marrow metastasis and DIC: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Predictive Mortality and Gastric Cancer Risk Using Clinical and Socio-Economic Data: A Nationwide Multicenter Cohort Study.Cancers · 2024Article
- FUS and METTL3 collaborate to regulate RNA maturation, preventing unfolded protein response and promoting gastric cancer progression.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2024Article
- Construction and SHAP interpretability analysis of a risk prediction model for feeding intolerance in preterm newborns based on machine learning.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Comparative study of ten machine learning algorithms for short-term forecasting in gas warning systems.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A review on advancements in feature selection and feature extraction for high-dimensional NGS data analysis.Functional & integrative genomics · 2024Review
- Novel research and future prospects of artificial intelligence in cancer diagnosis and treatment.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2023Review
- A comparison of random survival forest and Cox regression for prediction of mortality in patients with hemorrhagic stroke.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Article
- Identification of high-risk factors associated with mortality at 1-, 3-, and 5-year intervals in gastric cancer patients undergoing radical surgery and immunotherapy: an 8-year multicenter retrospective analysis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGastric cancer is the most common malignant tumor worldwide and a leading cause of cancer deaths. This neoplasm has a poor prognosis and heterogeneous outcomes. Survivability prediction may help select the best treatment plan based on an individual's prognosis. Numerous clinical and pathological features are generally used in predicting gastric cancer survival, and their influence on the survival of this cancer has not been fully elucidated. Moreover, the five-year survivability prognosis performances of feature selection methods with machine learning (ML) classifiers for gastric cancer have not been fully benchmarked. Therefore, we adopted several well-known feature selection methods and ML classifiers together to determine the best-paired feature selection-classifier for this purpose.
methodsThis was a retrospective study on a dataset of 974 patients diagnosed with gastric cancer in the Ayatollah Talleghani Hospital, Abadan, Iran. First, four feature selection algorithms, including Relief, Boruta, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR) were used to select a set of relevant features that are very informative for five-year survival prediction in gastric cancer patients. Then, each feature set was fed to three classifiers: XG Boost (XGB), hist gradient boosting (HGB), and support vector machine (SVM) to develop predictive models. Finally, paired feature selection-classifier methods were evaluated to select the best-paired method using the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and f1-score metrics.
resultsThe LASSO feature selection algorithm combined with the XG Boost classifier achieved an accuracy of 89.10%, a specificity of 87.15%, a sensitivity of 89.42%, an AUC of 89.37%, and an f1-score of 90.8%. Tumor stage, history of other cancers, lymphatic invasion, tumor site, type of treatment, body weight, histological type, and addiction were identified as the most significant factors affecting gastric cancer survival.
conclusionsThis study proved the worth of the paired feature selection-classifier to identify the best path that could augment the five-year survival prediction in gastric cancer patients. Our results were better than those of previous studies, both in terms of the time required to form the models and the performance measurement criteria of the algorithms. These findings may be very promising and can, therefore, inform clinical decision-making and shed light on future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.