Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37024882›Full record

Trial reportBMC pediatrics2023

Effect of eye shield and ear muffs on pain intensity during venous blood sampling in premature infants: a clinical trial study.

Fatemeh Shykhveisi, Roghayeh Jafarian Amiri, Ali Zabihi, Mohsen Haghshenas Mojaveri, Afsaneh Arzani, Mohammad Chehrazi, Zahra Valizadeh Chari

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Neonatal Pain Management: Is There An Endocrinal Response?Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fatemeh ShykhveisiFatemeh Shykhveisi (MSc), Student Research Committee, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.
Roghayeh Jafarian AmiriDepartment of Medical & Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.
Ali ZabihiSocial Determinants of Health Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran. zabihi_alii@yahoo.com.
Mohsen Haghshenas MojaveriDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Non-Communicable Pediatric Disease Research Center Health Research Institute Amirkola Hospital Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.
Afsaneh ArzaniNon-Communicable Pediatric Diseases Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.
Mohammad ChehraziDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Health, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.
Zahra Valizadeh ChariClinical Research Development Unit of Rouhani Hospital, Zahra Valizadeh Chari (BS), Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.
Babol University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundToday, due to the side effects of drugs, there is a greater desire to use non-pharmacological interventions to relieve pain caused by painful procedures. Using non-pharmacological interventions in combination is more effective than using them alone in relieving the pain of infants. Reducing sensory and environmental stimuli such as visual and auditory stimuli is one of the non-pharmacological methods to relieve pain. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of using eye shield and ear muffs on pain intensity during venous blood sampling of premature infants.

methodsIn this clinical trial study, 148 premature neonates admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of Rouhani and Children Hospitals in Babol were randomly assigned to four groups of 37. Fifteen minutes before intravenous blood sampling until 15 min later, in the first group, eye shield; in the second group, ear muffs, and in the third group, eye shield plus ear muffs were used. In the fourth group (control), blood sampling was performed routinely. NIPS pain scale and demographic questionnaire were used to collect the data.

resultsThe results showed that during the venous blood sampling was a significant difference between the mean pain intensity of neonatal in the eye shield plus ear muffs group (3.14 ± 0.71), the ear muffs group (4.43 ± 1.21), the eye shield group (5.41 ± 1.04).) and the control group (5.94 ± 0.84) (P = 0.001). Moreover, after the venous blood sampling, there was a significant difference between the mean neonatal pain intensity in the eye shield plus ear muffs group (1.19 ± 0.39), the ear muffs group (1.43 ± 0.50), the eye shield group (1.33 ± 0.37) and the control group (1.89 ± 0.90) (P = 0.001).

conclusionsIn this study, the pain severity during and after venous blood sampling in the ear muffs plus eye shield was lower than in other groups. Therefore, a combination of ear muffs and eye shield is recommended as a better pain reliever when performing venous blood sampling in premature infants.

Indexed as

Infant, PrematurePhlebotomyAcetaminophenChildHumansInfant, NewbornPainPain MeasurementAcetaminophenBlood samplingClinical trialEar muffsEye shieldPain managementPremature infants

Identifiers

PMID37024882
PMCPMC10077640
OpenAlexW4362668223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.