ArticleBMC ophthalmology2023
Analysis of potential impact factors of corneal biomechanics in myopia.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Relationship Between Scheimpflug-Based Ocular Biomechanics and Myopia Progression in Adolescents.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Multifactorial analysis of corneal biomechanical stability after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty: integration of anterior segment imaging indices and ocular response analyzer data.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Correlation Analysis of Bowman's Layer Microdistortions and Corneal Biomechanics Changes Evaluated by Brillouin Microscopy After KLEx.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Comparison of Optical Biometric Parameters Between Phakic and Pseudophakic Eyes: A Retrospective Clinical Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Corneal optical densitometry and anterior segment parameters in healthy upper Egyptian population: a prospective observational cross-sectional study.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Observational
- Causal Links Between Corneal Biomechanics and Myopia: Evidence from Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization in the UK Biobank.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The impact of age, gender, and ocular parameters on corneal biomechanics in Chinese refractive candidates.PloS one · 2025Article
- Comparison of biomechanical indices measured by ocular response analyzer between children and elderly: a systematic review.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Review
- Corneal biomechanics and diagnostics: a review.International ophthalmology · 2024Review
- Changes in corneal curvature and astigmatism in senile cataract patients after phacoemulsification.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Corneal Biomechanics as a Causal Factor in Myopia and Astigmatism: Evidence from Mendelian Randomization.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate potential impact factors associated with corneal biomechanical properties in Chinese myopia and further to investigate quantifying corneal biomechanics in clinical work.
methodsThree hundred fifty-five eyes from 181 healthy myopic subjects with a mean age of 25.1 ± 9.4 were recruited in this study. Each patient carried out a comprehensive ophthalmic examination, including corneal hysteresis(CH), corneal resistance factor(CRF), central corneal thickness(CCT), axial length(AL), intraocular pressure(IOP), spherical equivalence(SE) and corneal curvature (K). CH and CRF were measured with the ocular response analyzer(ORA). To analyze the corneal biomechanical characteristics of myopia patients and their association with other parameters.
resultThe multiple linear regression analysis showed that CH was positively associated with CCT, and corneal curvature (all with P < 0.05) and negatively associated with SE and AL)(all with P < 0.05); CRF was positively correlated with CCT, corneal curvature and IOP(all with P < 0.05), but negatively correlated with SE and AL(all with P < 0.05). The CH and CRF values in children group were both higher than adults group (≥ 18 years old) (P < 0.05), but it attributed to that the CCT of children was thicker than adults. Excluding factor of CCT, there was no significant difference in CH and CRF between children group and adult group. Excluding factor of CCT, there was no significant difference in CH and CRF among different stage of age (age 18-48).
conclusionThe CCT played the most important role of affecting the CH and CRF. The SE, corneal curvature, AL and IOP had a certain influence on corneal biomechanics. Whether the CH and CRF values of individual patient are normal in clinical work, it should refer to the CH and CRF values corresponding CCT sectional range and SE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.