ArticleBMC medical research methodology2023
Accounting for expected attrition in the planning of cluster randomized trials for assessing treatment effect heterogeneity.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Assessing treatment effect heterogeneity in the presence of missing effect modifier data in cluster-randomized trials.Statistical methods in medical research · 2024Article
- Interventions for Compassion Fatigue in Healthcare Providers-A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Sample size requirements for testing treatment effect heterogeneity in cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes.Statistics in medicine · 2023Article
- Correction: Accounting for expected attrition in the planning of cluster randomized trials for assessing treatment effect heterogeneity.BMC medical research methodology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDetecting treatment effect heterogeneity is an important objective in cluster randomized trials and implementation research. While sample size procedures for testing the average treatment effect accounting for participant attrition assuming missing completely at random or missing at random have been previously developed, the impact of attrition on the power for detecting heterogeneous treatment effects in cluster randomized trials remains unknown.
methodsWe provide a sample size formula for testing for a heterogeneous treatment effect assuming the outcome is missing completely at random. We also propose an efficient Monte Carlo sample size procedure for assessing heterogeneous treatment effect assuming covariate-dependent outcome missingness (missing at random). We compare our sample size methods with the direct inflation method that divides the estimated sample size by the mean follow-up rate. We also evaluate our methods through simulation studies and illustrate them with a real-world example.
resultsSimulation results show that our proposed sample size methods under both missing completely at random and missing at random provide sufficient power for assessing heterogeneous treatment effect. The proposed sample size methods lead to more accurate sample size estimates than the direct inflation method when the missingness rate is high (e.g., ≥ 30%). Moreover, sample size estimation under both missing completely at random and missing at random is sensitive to the missingness rate, but not sensitive to the intracluster correlation coefficient among the missingness indicators.
conclusionOur new sample size methods can assist in planning cluster randomized trials that plan to assess a heterogeneous treatment effect and participant attrition is expected to occur.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.