Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37024809›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2023

Accounting for expected attrition in the planning of cluster randomized trials for assessing treatment effect heterogeneity.

Jiaqi Tong, Fan Li, Michael O Harhay, Guangyu Tong

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jiaqi TongDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, 135 College Street, CT, New Haven, 06510, USA.
Fan LiDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, 135 College Street, CT, New Haven, 06510, USA.
Michael O HarhayDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Guangyu TongDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, 135 College Street, CT, New Haven, 06510, USA. guangyu.tong@yale.edu.
Yale University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Improving the measurement and analysis of long-term, patient-centered outcomes following acute respiratory failureR00HL141678 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HARHAY, MICHAEL OSCAR · 2020 to 2022
$747k
NHLBI NIH HHS R00 HL141678
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDetecting treatment effect heterogeneity is an important objective in cluster randomized trials and implementation research. While sample size procedures for testing the average treatment effect accounting for participant attrition assuming missing completely at random or missing at random have been previously developed, the impact of attrition on the power for detecting heterogeneous treatment effects in cluster randomized trials remains unknown.

methodsWe provide a sample size formula for testing for a heterogeneous treatment effect assuming the outcome is missing completely at random. We also propose an efficient Monte Carlo sample size procedure for assessing heterogeneous treatment effect assuming covariate-dependent outcome missingness (missing at random). We compare our sample size methods with the direct inflation method that divides the estimated sample size by the mean follow-up rate. We also evaluate our methods through simulation studies and illustrate them with a real-world example.

resultsSimulation results show that our proposed sample size methods under both missing completely at random and missing at random provide sufficient power for assessing heterogeneous treatment effect. The proposed sample size methods lead to more accurate sample size estimates than the direct inflation method when the missingness rate is high (e.g., ≥ 30%). Moreover, sample size estimation under both missing completely at random and missing at random is sensitive to the missingness rate, but not sensitive to the intracluster correlation coefficient among the missingness indicators.

conclusionOur new sample size methods can assist in planning cluster randomized trials that plan to assess a heterogeneous treatment effect and participant attrition is expected to occur.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalResearch DesignCluster AnalysisComputer SimulationData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSample SizeCluster randomized trialHeterogeneity of treatment effectIntracluster correlation coefficientMissing at randomMissing completely at randomMissing dataPower calculation

Identifiers

PMID37024809
PMCPMC10077680
OpenAlexW4362666695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.