Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37024806›Full record

ArticleBMC anesthesiology2023

Association between different MAP levels and 30-day mortality in sepsis patients: a propensity-score-matched, retrospective cohort study.

Xiaoxin Zhong, Haifeng Li, Qian Chen, Peng Hao, Tong Chen, Hantao Mai, Kelin Zhang, Guifang Zhong, Ruilian Guo, Huihua Cheng and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaoxin Zhong *Department of Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, No.107, Yanjiang West Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Haifeng Li *Department of Pediatric, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Sun Yat-sen University, No.600, Shipai Street, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, 510000, China.
Qian Chen *Department of Orthopedics, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, No.107, Yanjiang West Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Peng HaoDepartment of Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, No.107, Yanjiang West Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Tong ChenDepartment of Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, No.107, Yanjiang West Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Hantao MaiDepartment of Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, No.107, Yanjiang West Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Kelin ZhangDepartment of Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, No.107, Yanjiang West Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Guifang ZhongDepartment of Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, No.107, Yanjiang West Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Ruilian GuoDepartment of Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, No.107, Yanjiang West Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Huihua ChengDepartment of Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, No.107, Yanjiang West Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Benhua JiangDepartment of Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, No.107, Yanjiang West Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Sicong ZhuDepartment of Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, No.107, Yanjiang West Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Suyuan ZhuangDepartment of Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, No.107, Yanjiang West Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Haoran LiDepartment of Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, No.107, Yanjiang West Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Yantao ChenDepartment of Orthopedics, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, No.107, Yanjiang West Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, 510120, China. chenyant@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Qing HeDepartment of Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, No.107, Yanjiang West Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, 510120, China. heqing@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNThird Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by the infection-related host response disorder. Adequate mean arterial pressure is an important prerequisite of tissue and organ perfusion, which runs through the treatment of sepsis patients, and an appropriate mean arterial pressure titration in the early-stage correlates to the positive outcome of the treatment. Therefore, in the present study, we aimed to elucidate the relationship between early mean arterial pressure levels and short-term mortality in sepsis patients.

methodsWe included all suspected sepsis patients from MIMIC-III database with average mean arterial pressure ≥ 60 mmHg on the first day of intensive care unit stay. Those patients were then divided into a permissive low-mean arterial pressure group (60-65 mmHg) and a high-mean arterial pressure group (> 65 mmHg). Multivariate Cox regression analysis was conducted to analyze the relationship between MAP level and 30-day, 60-day, and 100-day mortality of suspected sepsis patients in the two groups. Propensity score matching, inverse probability of treatment weighing, standardized mortality ratio weighting, PA weighting, overlap weighting, and doubly robust analysis were used to verify our results.

resultsA total of 14,031 suspected sepsis patients were eligible for inclusion in our study, among which 1305 (9.3%) had an average first-day mean arterial pressure of 60-65 mmHg, and the remaining 12,726 patients had an average first-day mean arterial pressure of more than 65 mmHg. The risk of 30-day mortality was reduced in the high mean arterial pressure group compared with the permissive low-mean arterial pressure group (HR 0.67 (95% CI 0.60-0.75; p < 0.001)). The higher mean arterial pressure was also associated with lower 60-day and 100-day in-hospital mortality as well as with shorter duration of intensive care unit stay. Patients in the high-mean arterial pressure group also had more urine output on the first and second days of intensive care unit admission.

conclusionsAfter risk adjustment, the initial mean arterial pressure of above 65 mmHg was associated with reduced short-term mortality, shorter intensive care unit stay, and higher urine volume in the first two days among patients with sepsis.

Indexed as

HypotensionSepsisArterial PressureHumansIntensive Care UnitsPropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesMean arterial pressureMortalityRetrospective studySepsis

Identifiers

PMID37024806
PMCPMC10077659
OpenAlexW4362668240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.