Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37024761›Full record

ArticleAnnals of intensive care2023

Multiple-site decontamination to prevent acquired infection in patients with veno-venous ECMO support.

Nicolas Massart, Christophe Camus, Nicolas Nesseler, Pierre Fillâtre, Erwan Flecher, Alexandre Mansour, Jean-Philippe Verhoye, Lucie Le Fevre, Charles-Edouard Luyt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of intensive care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Which antimicrobial treatment for patients with bloodstream infection during ECMO support?European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nicolas Massart *Service de Réanimation, CH de St BRIEUC, 10, rue Marcel Proust, 22000, Saint-Brieuc, France. nicolas.massart@armorsante.bzh.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5828-0197
Christophe Camus *Service de réanimation médicale, CHU de Rennes, 2, rue Henri le Guilloux, 35000, Rennes, France.
Nicolas NesselerDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.
Pierre FillâtreService de Réanimation, CH de St BRIEUC, 10, rue Marcel Proust, 22000, Saint-Brieuc, France.
Erwan FlecherDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Rennes University Hospital, University of Rennes 1, Signal and Image Treatment Laboratory (LTSI), Inserm U1099, Rennes, France.
Alexandre MansourDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.
Jean-Philippe VerhoyeDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Rennes University Hospital, University of Rennes 1, Signal and Image Treatment Laboratory (LTSI), Inserm U1099, Rennes, France.
Lucie Le Fevre *Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Paris, France.
Charles-Edouard Luyt *Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute distress respiratory syndrome (ARDS) patients with veno-venous extra corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support are particularly exposed to ECMO-associated infection (ECMO-AI). Unfortunately, data regarding AI prophylaxis in this setting are lacking. Selective decontamination regimens decrease AI incidence, including ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and bloodstream infection (BSI) in critically ill patients. We hypothesized that a multiple-site decontamination (MSD) regimen is associated with a reduction in the incidence of AI among VV-ECMO patients.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective observational study in three French ECMO referral centers from January 2010 to December 2021. All adult patients (> 18 years old) who received VV-ECMO support for ARDS were eligible. In addition to standard care (SC), 2 ICUs used MSD, which consists of the administration of topical antibiotics four times daily in the oropharynx and the gastric tube, once daily chlorhexidine body-wash and a 5-day nasal mupirocin course. AIs were compared between the 2 ICUs using MSD (MSD group) and the last ICU using SC.

resultsThey were 241 patients available for the study. Sixty-nine were admitted in an ICU that applied MSD while the 172 others received standard care and constituted the SC group. There were 19 ECMO-AIs (12 VAP, 7 BSI) in the MSD group (1162 ECMO-days) compared to 143 AIs (104 VAP, 39 BSI) in the SC group (2376 ECMO-days), (p < 0.05 for all infection site). In a Poisson regression model, MSD was independently associated with a lower incidence of ECMO-AI (IRR = 0.42, 95% CI [0.23-0.60] p < 0.001). There were 30 multidrug resistant microorganisms (MDRO) acquisition in the SC group as compared with two in the MSD group (IRR = 0.13, 95% CI [0.03-0.56] p = 0.001). Mortality in ICU was similar in both groups (43% in the SC group vs 45% in the MSD group p = 0.90). Results were similar after propensity-score matching.

conclusionIn this cohort of patients from different hospitals, MSD appeared to be safe in ECMO patients and may be associated with improved outcomes including lower ECMO-AI and MDRO acquisition incidences. Since residual confounders may persist, these promising results deserve confirmation by randomized controlled trials.

Indexed as

BacteremiaCritical careExtra corporal membrane oxygenationHospital acquired infectionPneumonia

Identifiers

PMID37024761
PMCPMC10079793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.