Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37024758›Full record

Observational studyWorld journal of surgery2023

Implementing Enhanced Perioperative Care in Emergency General Surgery: A Prospective Multicenter Observational Study.

Marco Ceresoli, Alan Biloslavo, Pietro Bisagni, Carlo Ciuffa, Laura Fortuna, Antonio La Greca, Dario Tartaglia, Mauro Zago, Ferdinando Ficari, Giuseppe Foti and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in World journal of surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Marco CeresoliGeneral and Emergency Surgery Department, School of Medicine and Surgery, Milano-Bicocca University, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900, Monza, Italy. marco.ceresoli@unimib.it.ORCID 0000-0001-7935-3842
Alan BiloslavoGeneral Surgery Department, Cattinara Hospital, ASUGI, Strada Di Fiume, 447, 34149, Trieste, Italy.
Pietro BisagniGeneral and Emergency Surgery, ASST Lodi, Lodi, Italy.
Carlo CiuffaGeneral and Emergency Surgery, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Laura FortunaGeneral Surgery, Ospedale S. Jacopo, Pistoia, Italy.
Antonio La GrecaEmergency Surgery and Trauma, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS Roma - Universita' Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome RM, Italy.
Dario TartagliaGeneral, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Unit, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Mauro ZagoEmergency and Robotic Surgery Department, Emergency and General Surgery Unit, A. Manzoni Hospital-ASST, Lecco, Italy.
Ferdinando FicariGeneral Surgery, Careggi Hospital, University of Firenze, Florence, Italy.
Giuseppe FotiAnesthesia and Intensive Care Department, School of Medicine and Surgery, Milano-Bicocca University, Monza, Italy.
Marco BragaGeneral and Emergency Surgery Department, School of Medicine and Surgery, Milano-Bicocca University, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900, Monza, Italy.
ERAS-emergency surgery collaborative group
Ospedale del Ceppo · ITAlessandro Manzoni Hospital · ITOspedale di Cattinara · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversity of Pisa · ITOspedale Maggiore di Lodi · ITUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · ITIRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele · ITAziende Socio Sanitarie Territoriale LodiAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionERAS pathway has been proposed as the standard of care in elective abdominal surgery. Guidelines on ERAS in emergency surgery have been recently published; however, few evidences are still available in the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of an enhanced recovery protocol in a large cohort of patients undergoing emergency surgery and to identify possible factors impacting postoperative protocol compliance.

methodsThis is a prospective multicenter observational study including patients who underwent major emergency general surgery for either intra-abdominal infection or intestinal obstruction. The primary endpoint of the study is the adherence to ERAS postoperative protocol. Secondary endpoints are 30-day mortality and morbidity rates, and length of hospital stay.

resultsA total of 589 patients were enrolled in the study, 256 (43.5%) of them underwent intestinal resection with anastomosis. Major complications occurred in 92 (15.6%) patients and 30-day mortality was 6.3%. Median adherence occurred on postoperative day (POD) 1 for naso-gastric tube removal, on POD 2 for mobilization and urinary catheter removal, and on POD 3 for oral intake and i.v. fluid suspension. Laparoscopy was significantly associated with adherence to postoperative protocol, whereas operative fluid infusion > 12 mL/Kg/h, preoperative hyperglycemia, presence of a drain, duration of surgery and major complications showed a negative association.

conclusionsThe present study supports that an enhanced recovery protocol in emergency surgery is feasible and safe. Laparoscopy was associated with an earlier recovery, whereas preoperative hyperglycemia, fluid overload, and abdominal drain were associated with a delayed recovery.

Indexed as

Perioperative CarePostoperative ComplicationsDevice RemovalElective Surgical ProceduresHumansLength of StayProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID37024758
PMCPMC10079158
OpenAlexW4362664414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.