Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37024736›Full record

ArticleDrug safety2023

Cohort Event Monitoring of Adverse Reactions to COVID-19 Vaccines in Seven European Countries: Pooled Results on First Dose.

Monika Raethke, Florence van Hunsel, Nicolas H Thurin, Caroline Dureau-Pournin, Dirk Mentzer, Barbara Kovačić, Nikica Mirošević Skvrce, Evelien De Clercq, Martine Sabbe, Gianluca Trifirò and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug safety, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Monika RaethkeNetherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, Goudsbloemvallei 7, 5237 MH, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands. m.raethke@lareb.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-5334-1840
Florence van HunselNetherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, Goudsbloemvallei 7, 5237 MH, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8965-3224
Nicolas H ThurinBordeaux PharmacoEpi, INSERM CIC-P 1401, Univ. Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3589-0819
Caroline Dureau-PourninBordeaux PharmacoEpi, INSERM CIC-P 1401, Univ. Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3643-683X
Dirk MentzerDepartment Safety of Drugs and Medical Devices, Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Federal Institute for Vaccines and Biomedicines, Langen, Germany.
Barbara KovačićAgency for Medicinal Products and Medical Devices of Croatia (HALMED), Zagreb, Croatia.
Nikica Mirošević SkvrceAgency for Medicinal Products and Medical Devices of Croatia (HALMED), Zagreb, Croatia.
Evelien De ClercqFederal Agency for Medicines and Health Products (FAMHP), Brussels, Belgium.
Martine SabbeFederal Agency for Medicines and Health Products (FAMHP), Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2824-1087
Gianluca TrifiròDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1147-7296
Nicoletta LuxiDepartment of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Alexia GiovanazziDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Saad ShakirDrug Safety Research Unit, Southampton, UK.
Olaf H KlungelDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology & Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Sandor SchmikliDepartment Data Science & Biostatistics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Miriam SturkenboomDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology & Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1360-2388
University of Verona · ITAgency for Medicinal Products and Medical Devices of Croatia · HRNetherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb · NLUniversité de Bordeaux · FRUtrecht University · NLDrug Safety Research Unit · GBPaul Ehrlich Institut · DEUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCOVID-19 vaccines were rapidly authorised, thus requiring intense post-marketing re-evaluation of their benefit-risk profile. A multi-national European collaboration was established with the aim to prospectively monitor safety of the COVID-19 vaccines through web-based survey of vaccinees.

methodsA prospective cohort event monitoring study was conducted with primary consented data collection in seven European countries. Through the web applications, participants received and completed baseline and up to six follow-up questionnaires on self-reported adverse reactions for at least 6 months following the first dose of COVID-19 vaccine (Netherlands, France, Belgium, UK, Italy) and baseline and up to ten follow-up questionnaires for one year in Germany and Croatia. Rates of adverse reactions have been described by type (solicited, non-solicited; serious/non-serious; and adverse events of special interest) and stratified by vaccine brand. We calculated the frequency of adverse reaction after dose 1 and prior to dose 2 among all vaccinees who completed at least one follow-up questionnaire.

resultsOverall, 117,791 participants were included and completed the first questionnaire in addition to the baseline: 88,196 (74.9%) from Germany, 27,588 (23.4%) from Netherlands, 984 (0.8%) from France, 570 (0.5%) from Italy, 326 (0.3%) from Croatia, 89 (0.1%) from the UK and 38 (0.03%) from Belgium. There were 89,377 (75.9%) respondents who had received AstraZeneca vaccines, 14,658 (12.4%) BioNTech/Pfizer, 11,266 (9.6%) Moderna and 2490 (2.1%) Janssen vaccines as a first dose. Median age category was 40-49 years for all vaccines except for Pfizer where median age was 70-79 years. Most vaccinees were female with a female-to-male ratio of 1.34, 1.96 and 2.50 for AstraZeneca, Moderna and Janssen, respectively. BioNtech/Pfizer had slightly more men with a ratio of 0.82. Fatigue and headache were the most commonly reported solicited systemic adverse reactions and injection-site pain was the most common solicited local reaction. The rates of adverse events of special interest (AESIs) were 0.1-0.2% across all vaccine brands.

conclusionThis large-scale prospective study of COVID-19 vaccine recipients showed, for all the studied vaccines, a high frequency of systemic reactions, related to the immunogenic response, and local reactions at the injection site, while serious reactions or AESIs were uncommon, consistent with those reported on product labels. This study demonstrated the feasibility of setting up and conducting cohort event monitoring across multiple European countries to collect safety data on novel vaccines that are rolled out at scale in populations which may not have been included in pivotal trials.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAdultAgedBelgiumEuropeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID37024736
PMCPMC10079486
OpenAlexW4362692207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.