Article3D printing in medicine2023
Navigating the intersection of 3D printing, software regulation and quality control for point-of-care manufacturing of personalized anatomical models.
Article in 3D printing in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- A review of 3D printed medical implant design.3D printing in medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Selected Properties of Ti Coatings Deposited on MED610 for Medical Applications.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- 3D printed polymers that mimic the mechanical properties of atherosclerotic blood vessels for training models: the advantageous degradation induced by UV radiation and hydrolysis.3D printing in medicine · 2025Article
- Investigation of the Clinical Value of Four Visualization Modalities for Congenital Heart Disease.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Article
- Exploring CT pixel and voxel size effect on anatomic modeling in mandibular reconstruction.3D printing in medicine · 2024Article
- Core Legal Challenges for Medical 3D Printing in the EU.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Low-Cost 3D Models for Cervical Spine Tumor Removal Training for Neurosurgery Residents.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- 3D Printing Applications for Craniomaxillofacial Reconstruction: A Sweeping Review.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2023Review
- Correction: Navigating the intersection of 3D printing, software regulation and quality control for point-of-care manufacturing of personalized anatomical models.3D printing in medicine · 2023Article
- Technical improvements in preparing 3D printed anatomical models for comminuted fracture preoperative planning.3D printing in medicine · 2023Article
- Development of an individual helmet orthosis for infants based on a 3D scan.3D printing in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
3D printing technology has become increasingly popular in healthcare settings, with applications of 3D printed anatomical models ranging from diagnostics and surgical planning to patient education. However, as the use of 3D printed anatomical models becomes more widespread, there is a growing need for regulation and quality control to ensure their accuracy and safety. This literature review examines the current state of 3D printing in hospitals and FDA regulation process for software intended for use in producing 3D printed models and provides for the first time a comprehensive list of approved software platforms alongside the 3D printers that have been validated with each for producing 3D printed anatomical models. The process for verification and validation of these 3D printed products, as well as the potential for inaccuracy in these models, is discussed, including methods for testing accuracy, limits, and standards for accuracy testing. This article emphasizes the importance of regulation and quality control in the use of 3D printing technology in healthcare, the need for clear guidelines and standards for both the software and the printed products to ensure the safety and accuracy of 3D printed anatomical models, and the opportunity to expand the library of regulated 3D printers.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.