Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37024572›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Context expectation influences the gait pattern biomechanics.

Tommaso Ciceri, Giorgia Malerba, Alice Gatti, Eleonora Diella, Denis Peruzzo, Emilia Biffi, Luca Casartelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tommaso CiceriDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Padua, PD, Italy.
Giorgia MalerbaBioengineering Lab, Scientific Institute IRCCS E. Medea, Bosisio Parini, LC, Italy.
Alice GattiDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, MI, Italy.
Eleonora DiellaBioengineering Lab, Scientific Institute IRCCS E. Medea, Bosisio Parini, LC, Italy.
Denis PeruzzoNeuroimaging Lab, Scientific Institute IRCCS E. Medea, Bosisio Parini, LC, Italy.
Emilia BiffiBioengineering Lab, Scientific Institute IRCCS E. Medea, Bosisio Parini, LC, Italy. emilia.biffi@lanostrafamiglia.it.
Luca CasartelliTheoretical and Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, Scientific Institute IRCCS E. Medea, Bosisio Parini, LC, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Beyond classical aspects related to locomotion (biomechanics), it has been hypothesized that walking pattern is influenced by a combination of distinct computations including online sensory/perceptual sampling and the processing of expectations (neuromechanics). Here, we aimed to explore the potential impact of contrasting scenarios ("risky and potentially dangerous" scenario; "safe and comfortable" scenario) on walking pattern in a group of healthy young adults. Firstly, and consistently with previous literature, we confirmed that the scenario influences gait pattern when it is recalled concurrently to participants' walking activity (motor interference). More intriguingly, our main result showed that participants' gait pattern is also influenced by the contextual scenario when it is evoked only before the start of walking activity (motor expectation). This condition was designed to test the impact of expectations (risky scenario vs. safe scenario) on gait pattern, and the stimulation that preceded walking activity served as prior. Noteworthy, we combined statistical and machine learning (Support-Vector Machine classifier) approaches to stratify distinct levels of analyses that explored the multi-facets architecture of walking. In a nutshell, our combined statistical and machine learning analyses converge in suggesting that walking before steps is not just a paradox.

Indexed as

GaitMotivationBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansJointsWalkingYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID37024572
PMCPMC10079826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.