ArticleScientific data2023
Data and Tools Integration in the Canadian Open Neuroscience Platform.
Article in Scientific data, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- TrainTracks - federated learning for reproducible research on sensitive medical data.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Computational whole-body-exposome models for global precision brain health.Nature communications · 2025Article
- NeuroDISK: An AI Approach to Automate Continuous Inquiry-Driven Discoveries in Neuroimaging Genetics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Open-source platforms to investigate analytical flexibility in neuroimaging.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- A reproducible and generalizable software workflow for analysis of large-scale neuroimaging data collections using BIDS Apps.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- The Canadian Open Neuroscience Platform-An open science framework for the neuroscience community.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Neuroimaging data repositories and AI-driven healthcare-Global aspirations vs. ethical considerations in machine learning models of neurological disease.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2023Article
- FAIR in action: Brain-CODE - A neuroscience data sharing platform to accelerate brain research.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2023Article
- The past, present and future of neuroscience data sharing: a perspective on the state of practices and infrastructure for FAIR.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
45 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We present the Canadian Open Neuroscience Platform (CONP) portal to answer the research community's need for flexible data sharing resources and provide advanced tools for search and processing infrastructure capacity. This portal differs from previous data sharing projects as it integrates datasets originating from a number of already existing platforms or databases through DataLad, a file level data integrity and access layer. The portal is also an entry point for searching and accessing a large number of standardized and containerized software and links to a computing infrastructure. It leverages community standards to help document and facilitate reuse of both datasets and tools, and already shows a growing community adoption giving access to more than 60 neuroscience datasets and over 70 tools. The CONP portal demonstrates the feasibility and offers a model of a distributed data and tool management system across 17 institutions throughout Canada.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.