Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37024148›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2023

Learning needs and perceived barriers and facilitators to end-of-life care: a survey of front-line nurses on acute medical wards.

Julie C Reid, Neala Hoad, Kathleen Willison, Rajendar Hanmiah, Daniel Brandt Vegas, Mino Mitri, Anne Boyle, Amanda Weatherston, Susan Lohin, Deborah McInnes and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Julie C ReidDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University Medical Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada reidj7@mcmaster.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-1424-3105
Neala HoadDepartment of Critical Care, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Kathleen WillisonDepartment of Medicine, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Rajendar HanmiahDepartment of Medicine, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Daniel Brandt VegasDepartment of Medicine, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Mino MitriDepartment of Medicine, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Anne BoyleDepartment of Medicine, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Amanda WeatherstonDepartment of Medicine, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Susan LohinDepartment of Patient Experience, Quality, and Patient Safety, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Deborah McInnesDepartment of Patient Experience, Quality, and Patient Safety, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Jill C RudkowskiDepartment of Critical Care, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Michelle JoynerDepartment of Patient Experience, Quality, and Patient Safety, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Deborah J CookDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University Medical Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton · CAMcMaster University Medical Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCaring for dying hospitalised patients is a healthcare priority. Our objective was to understand the learning needs of front-line nurses on the general internal medicine (GIM) hospital wards, and perceived barriers to, and facilitators of, optimal end-of-life care.

methodsWe developed an 85-item survey informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework and Capability-Opportunity-Motivation-Behaviour system. We included demographics and two main domains (knowledge and practice; delivering end-of-life care) with seven subsections. Nurses from four GIM wards and the nursing resource team completed this survey. We analysed and compared results overall, by Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation, and by survey domain. We considered items with median scores <4/7 barriers. We conducted an a priori subgroup analysis based on duration of practice (≤5 and >5 years).

resultsOur response rate was 60.5% (144/238). 51% had been practising for >5 years; most respondents were female (93.1%). Nurses had similar scores on the knowledge (mean 76.0%; SD 11.6%) and delivering care (mean 74.5% (8.6%)) domains. Scores for items associated with Capability were higher than those associated with Opportunity (median (first, third quartiles) 78.6% (67.9%, 87.5%) vs 73.9% (66.0%, 81.8%); p=0.04). Nurses practising >5 years had significantly higher scores on all analyses. Barriers included engaging with families having strong emotional reactions, managing goals of care conflicts between patients and families, and staffing challenges on the ward. Additional requested resources included formal training, information binders and more staff. Opportunities for consideration include formalised on-the-job training, access to comprehensive information, including symptom management at the end of life, and debriefing sessions.

conclusionsFront-line nurses reported an interest in learning more about end-of-life care and identified important barriers that are feasible to address. These results will inform specific knowledge translation strategies to build capacity among bedside nurses to enhance end-of-life care practices for dying patients on GIM wards.

Indexed as

Hospice CareNursesTerminal CareFemaleHospitalsHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesHealthcare quality improvementHospice and Palliative Care NursingPalliative CareTerminal Care

Identifiers

PMID37024148
PMCPMC10083844
OpenAlexW4362673642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.