ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2023
State-Specific Configuration Interaction for Excited States.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leveraging Configuration Interaction Singles for Qualitative Descriptions of Ground and Excited States: State-Averaging, Linear-Response, and Spin-Projection.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- Optimal-Reference Excited State Methods: Static Correlation at Polynomial Cost with Single-Reference Coupled-Cluster Approaches.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- State-Specific Coupled-Cluster Methods for Excited States.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024Article
- Excited States by Coupling Piris Natural Orbital Functionals with the Extended Random-Phase Approximation.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024Article
- Excited States, Symmetry Breaking, and Unphysical Solutions in State-Specific CASSCF Theory.The journal of physical chemistry. A · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We introduce and benchmark a systematically improvable route for excited-state calculations, labeled state-specific configuration interaction (ΔCI), which is a particular realization of multiconfigurational self-consistent field and multireference configuration interaction. Starting with a reference built from optimized configuration state functions, separate CI calculations are performed for each targeted state (hence, state-specific orbitals and determinants). Accounting for single and double excitations produces the ΔCISD model, which can be improved with second-order Epstein-Nesbet perturbation theory (ΔCISD+EN2) or a posteriori Davidson corrections (ΔCISD+Q). These models were gauged against a vast and diverse set of 294 reference excitation energies. We have found that ΔCI is significantly more accurate than standard ground-state-based CI, whereas close performances were found between ΔCISD and EOM-CC2 and between ΔCISD+EN2 and EOM-CCSD. For larger systems, ΔCISD+Q delivers more accurate results than EOM-CC2 and EOM-CCSD. The ΔCI route can handle challenging multireference problems, singly and doubly excited states, from closed- and open-shell species, with overall comparable accuracy and thus represents a promising alternative to more established methodologies. In its current form, however, it is reliable only for relatively low-lying excited states.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.