Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37023670›Full record

ReviewNursing outlook

A historical review of pain disparities research: Advancing toward health equity and empowerment.

Staja Q Booker, Tamara A Baker, Darlingtina Esiaka, Jacquelyn A Minahan, Ilana J Engel, Kasturi Banerjee, Michaela Poitevien

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nursing outlook. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Topical ophthalmic anesthetics for corneal abrasions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Intersectional pain disparities and resilience in veterans with chronic pain.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2026
    Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Attending to Marginalization in The Chronic Pain Literature: A Scoping Review.Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Staja Q BookerCollege of Nursing, The University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. Electronic address: bookers@ufl.edu.
Tamara A BakerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Darlingtina EsiakaDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ.
Jacquelyn A MinahanIntegrated Pain Service, Kaiser Permanente, Denver, CO.
Ilana J EngelDepartment of Psychology, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS.
Kasturi BanerjeeDepartment of Psychology, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS.
Michaela PoitevienDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Barry University, Miami Shores, FL.

Funding

Investigating Movement-evoked Pain in osteoArthritic Conditions (IMPACT): An Observational Study to Inform Culturally-Tailored Intervention DevelopmentK23AR076463 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BOOKER, STAJA · 2020 to 2022
$379k
NIAMS NIH HHS K23 AR076463
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThis theory-guided review draws on 30 years of published data to examine and interrogate the current and future state of pain disparities research.

methodsUsing the Hierarchy of Health Disparity Research framework, we synthesize and present an overview of "three generations" of pain disparities scholarship, while proposing directions for adopting a "fourth generation" that redefines, explains, and theorizes future pain disparities research in a diverse society. DISCUSSION: Prior research has focused on describing the scope of disparities, and throughout the historical context of human existence, racialized groups have been subjected to inadequate pain care. It is imperative that research not only illuminates existing problems but also provides solutions that can be implemented and sustained across varying social milieus.

conclusionWe must invest in new theoretical models that expand on current perspectives and ideals that position all individuals at the forefront of justice and equity in their health.

Indexed as

Health EquityEmpowermentHealthcare DisparitiesHumansPainSocial JusticeBlack AmericansEquityHealth disparitiesHierarchy of health disparity researchPainPain research

Identifiers

PMID37023670
PMCPMC11198876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.