Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37023419›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2023

Predicting Habitual Use of Wearable Health Devices Among Middle-aged Individuals With Metabolic Syndrome Risk Factors in South Korea: Cross-sectional Study.

Jaeyoung Ha, Jungmi Park, Sangyi Lee, Jeong Lee, Jin-Young Choi, Junhyoung Kim, Sung-Il Cho, Gyeong-Suk Jeon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jaeyoung HaDepartment of Public Health Science, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3053-2054
Jungmi ParkDepartment of Public Health Science, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3995-1033
Sangyi LeeDepartment of Public Health Science, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3312-1901
Jeong LeeDepartment of Nursing, Chodang University, Muan, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1332-1132
Jin-Young ChoiDepartment of Public Health Science, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0623-0643
Junhyoung KimDepartment of Public Health Science, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7326-6641
Sung-Il ChoDepartment of Public Health Science, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4085-1494
Gyeong-Suk JeonDepartment of Nursing, Mokpo National University, Muan, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8574-7936

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevention of the risk factors for metabolic syndrome (MetS) in middle-aged individuals is an important public health issue. Technology-mediated interventions, such as wearable health devices, can aid in lifestyle modification, but they require habitual use to sustain healthy behavior. However, the underlying mechanisms and predictors of habitual use of wearable health devices among middle-aged individuals remain unclear.

objectiveWe investigated the predictors of habitual use of wearable health devices among middle-aged individuals with risk factors for MetS.

methodsWe proposed a combined theoretical model based on the health belief model, the Unified Technology of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2, and perceived risk. We conducted a web-based survey of 300 middle-aged individuals with MetS between September 3 and 7, 2021. We validated the model using structural equation modeling.

resultsThe model explained 86.6% of the variance in the habitual use of wearable health devices. The goodness-of-fit indices revealed that the proposed model has a desirable fit with the data. Performance expectancy was the core variable explaining the habitual use of wearable devices. The direct effect of the performance expectancy on habitual use of wearable devices was greater (β=.537, P<.001) than that of intention to continue use (β=.439, P<.001), and the total effect estimate of the performance expectancy was 0.909 (P<.001), including the indirect effect (β=.372, P=.03) on habitual use of wearable devices via intention to continue use. Furthermore, performance expectancy was influenced by health motivation (β=.497, P<.001), effort expectancy (β=.558, P<.001), and risk perception (β=.137, P=.02). Perceived vulnerability (β=.562, P<.001) and perceived severity (β=.243, P=.008) contributed to health motivation.

conclusionsThe results suggest the importance of the users' performance expectations for wearable health devices for the intention of continued use for self-health management and habituation. Based on our results, developers and health care practitioners should find better ways to meet the performance expectations of middle-aged individuals with MetS risk factors. They also should generate device use easier and find a way to encourage users' health motivation, thereby reducing users' effort expectancy and resulting in a reasonable performance expectancy of the wearable health device, to induce users' habitual use behaviors.

Indexed as

acceptabilitydigital interventionhabitual useHBMhealth promotionmetabolic syndromepredictors of useUTAUT2wearable health deviceswearables

Identifiers

PMID37023419
PMCPMC10131994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.