Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37023121›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Open Science Drone Toolkit: Open source hardware and software for aerial data capture.

Gustavo Pereyra Irujo, Paz Bernaldo, Luciano Velázquez, Antoni Pérez, Celeste Molina Favero, Alejandrina Egozcue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gustavo Pereyra IrujoInstituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Balcarce, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-2261-6928
Paz BernaldoIndependent Researcher, Melipilla, Chile.
Luciano VelázquezFacultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Balcarce, Argentina.
Antoni PérezIndependent Researcher, Santiago, Chile.
Celeste Molina FaveroUnidad Integrada Balcarce, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Balcarce, Argentina.
Alejandrina EgozcueIndependent Researcher, Balcarce, Argentina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the increased access to scientific publications and data as a result of open science initiatives, access to scientific tools remains limited. Uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs, or drones) can be a powerful tool for research in disciplines such as agriculture and environmental sciences, but their use in research is currently dominated by proprietary, closed source tools. The objective of this work was to collect, curate, organize and test a set of open source tools for aerial data capture for research purposes. The Open Science Drone Toolkit was built through a collaborative and iterative process by more than 100 people in five countries, and comprises an open-hardware autonomous drone and off-the-shelf hardware, open-source software, and guides and protocols that enable the user to perform all the necessary tasks to obtain aerial data. Data obtained with this toolkit over a wheat field was compared to data from satellite imagery and a commercial hand-held sensor, finding a high correlation for both instruments. Our results demonstrate the possibility of capturing research-grade aerial data using affordable, accessible, and customizable open source software and hardware, and using open workflows.

Indexed as

Satellite ImageryUnmanned Aerial DevicesComputersHumansSoftware

Identifiers

PMID37023121
PMCPMC10079087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.