Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37023074›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Personal and relational changes following deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: A prospective qualitative study with patients and caregivers.

Cassandra J Thomson, Rebecca A Segrave, Paul B Fitzgerald, Karyn E Richardson, Eric Racine, Adrian Carter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. SmartFSCV: An Artificial Intelligence Enabled Miniaturised FSCV Device Targeting Serotonin.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Cassandra J ThomsonSchool of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8737-2592
Rebecca A SegraveSchool of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Paul B FitzgeraldSchool of Medicine and Psychology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Karyn E RichardsonSchool of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Eric RacinePragmatic Health Ethics Research Unit, Institut de recherches cliniques de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Adrian CarterSchool of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Monash University · AUAustralian National University · AUMontreal Clinical Research Institute · CAUniversity of Tasmania · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDeep brain stimulation (DBS) and whether it alters patient personality is a much-debated topic within academic literature, yet rarely explored with those directly involved. This study qualitatively examined how DBS for treatment-resistant depression impacts patient personality, self-concept, and relationships from the perspectives of both patients and caregivers.

methodsA prospective qualitative design was used. Eleven participants were included (six patients, five caregivers). Patients were enrolled in a clinical trial of DBS of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants before DBS-implantation and 9-months after stimulation-initiation. The 21 interviews were thematically analysed.

resultsThree primary themes were identified: (a) impact of mental illness and treatment on self-concept; (b) device acceptability and usability, and (c) relationships and connection. Severe refractory depression had profoundly impacted who patients were, how they viewed themselves, and the quality and functioning of their relationships. Patients who benefited from DBS felt reconnected with their premorbid self, yet still far from their ideal self. While reductions in depression were broadly beneficial for relationships, the process of adjusting relationship dynamics created new challenges. All patients reported recharging difficulties and challenges adapting to the device.

conclusionsTherapeutic response to DBS is a gradual and complex process that involves an evolving self-concept, adjusting relationship dynamics, and growing connection between body and device. This is the first study to provide in-depth insight into the lived experience of DBS for treatment-resistant depression. Patient and caregiver narrative accounts should be routinely collected to guide more person-centred DBS clinical interventions.

Indexed as

Deep Brain StimulationDepressive Disorder, Treatment-ResistantCaregiversDepressionHumansProspective StudiesQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID37023074
PMCPMC10079124
OpenAlexW4362657209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.