ArticlePloS one2023
Ensuring that a school-based smoking cessation program for adolescents is successful: A realist evaluation of the TABADO program and the program theory.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effectiveness of online smoking prevention program for adolescents in South Korea: a comparative analysis with traditional education.Korean journal of family medicine · 2026Article
- Context, mechanisms, and outcomes of smoke-free school hours in social and health care vocational schools: a realist informed qualitative analysis.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Factors associated with smoking cessation among adolescents: A retrospective study in a smoking cessation outpatient clinic.Tobacco induced diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA smoking cessation program for adolescents, TABADO, demonstrated its effectiveness following a controlled trial conducted in 2007/2009. The program is now being scaled up nationally. In order to retain its efficacy across the diversity of contexts in the generalization process, we needed to assess the processes and mechanisms that inform its effects. Theory-driven evaluation is one approach used to address these issues. The aim of the present research is to develop the TABADO program theory. More specifically, we attempt to identify the factors and mechanisms that promote or hinder the enrollment and retention of student smokers in the program.
methodsWe conducted a realist evaluation of the TABADO program through 1) a documentary analysis to construct the initial program theory, and 2) a multiple case study (n = 10) conducted in three regions in France to test and enrich the initial theory with contextual, organizational and mechanistic components. We used the Intervention-Context-Actors-Mechanisms-Outcomes configurations to guide our analysis and to present our results.
resultsOur analysis highlighted 13 mechanisms that foster the enrollment and retention of student smokers in the TABADO program (e.g., being prepared to quit smoking, feeling encouraged in the attempt to quit smoking). To activate these mechanisms, the involvement of various actors is required (e.g., the school nurse, teachers), together with a combination of interventional and contextual factors (e.g., confidentiality, informal speaking time).
conclusionsThese findings allowed us to transform the TABADO program into a new optimized strategy, TABADO2, which is theory-based. Our research helps to explain why adolescent smokers enroll and stay in a school-based smoking cessation program. TABADO2 needs to be considered in a more comprehensive way than the original research-based TABADO, and should be tailored to its implementation context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.