ArticlePloS one2023
Characterizing subgroups of sexual behaviors among men who have sex with men eligible for, but not using, PrEP in the Netherlands.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characterising individuals with newly diagnosed HIV before versus during the era of PrEP: a descriptive time-series analysis of data from a sexual health centre in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 2015 to 2024.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study identified subgroups of sexual behaviors associated with increased STI/HIV risk among those eligible for but not using pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in order to improve PrEP uptake and prioritization in the context of restricted capacity. We used data from sexual health centers (SHCs) in the Netherlands, including all visits of eligible but non-PrEP using men who have sex with men (MSM), men who have sex with men and women (MSMW) and transgender persons between July 2019 (start of the Dutch national PrEP pilot (NPP)) and June 2021. Using latent class analysis (LCA), we identified classes of sexual behaviors (number of partners, chemsex, group sex and sex work) and explored whether these classes were associated with STI diagnosis and sociodemographics. Across 45,582 visits of 14,588 eligible non-PrEP using individuals, the best fitting LCA model contained three classes of sexual behaviors. Classes were distinguished by seldomly reported sexual behaviors (class 1; 53.5%, n = 24,383), the highest proportions of ≥6 partners and group sex (class 2; 29.8%, n = 13,596), and the highest proportions of chemsex and sex work (class 3; 16.7% of visits, n = 7,603). Visits in classes 2 and 3 (vs. class 1) were significantly more often with individuals who were diagnosed with an STI, older (≥36 vs. ≤35 years), MSMW (vs. MSM), and visiting an urban (vs. non-urban) SHC; while these visits were significantly less often with individuals from an STI/HIV endemic area. The percentage of visits at which an STI was diagnosed was 17.07% (n = 4,163) in class 1, 19.53% (n = 2,655) in class 2 and 25.25% (n = 1,920) in class 3. The highest risk of STI, and thereby HIV, was in those engaging in specific subgroups of sexual behavior characterized by frequently reporting multiple partners, group sex, sex work or chemsex. PrEP uptake should be encouraged and prioritized for these individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.