Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37022996›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2023

Mobile phone use for pregnancy-related healthcare utilization and its association with optimum antenatal care and hospital delivery in Bangladesh.

Gulam Muhammed Al Kibria, Mohammad Rashidul Hashan, Abu Abdullah Mohammod Hanif, Vidhi Maniar, Md Shajedur Rahman Shawon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Gulam Muhammed Al KibriaJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7037-6658
Mohammad Rashidul HashanBangladesh Civil Service, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Abu Abdullah Mohammod HanifBRAC James P Grant School of Public Health, BRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6274-5612
Vidhi ManiarJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9511-1421
Md Shajedur Rahman ShawonCentre for Big Data Research on Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4502-1457
Johns Hopkins University · USBRAC University · BDMinistry of Health and Family Welfare · BDUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pregnancy-related healthcare utilization is inadequate in Bangladesh, where more than half of pregnant women do not receive optimum number of antenatal care (ANC) visits or do not deliver child in hospitals. Mobile phone use could improve such healthcare utilization; however, limited evidence exists in Bangladesh. We investigated the pattern, trends, and factors associated with mobile phone use for pregnancy-related healthcare and how this can impact at least 4 ANC visits and hospital delivery in the country. We analyzed cross-sectional data from Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey (BDHS) 2014 (n = 4,465) and 2017-18 (n = 4,903). Only 28.5% and 26.6% women reported using mobile phones for pregnancy-related causes in 2014 and 2017-18, respectively. Majority of the time, women used mobile phones to seek information or to contact service providers. In both survey periods, women with a higher education level, more educated husbands, a higher household wealth index, and residence in certain administrative divisions had greater likelihoods of using mobile phones for pregnancy-related causes. In BDHS 2014, proportions of at least 4 ANC and hospital delivery were, respectively, 43.3% and 57.0% among users, and 26.4% and 31.2% among non-users. In adjusted analysis, the odds of utilizing at least 4 ANC were 1.6 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.4-1.9) in BDHS 2014 and 1.4 (95% CI: 1.3-1.7) in BDHS 2017-18 among users. Similarly, in BDHS 2017-18, proportions of at least 4 ANC and hospital delivery were, respectively, 59.1% and 63.8% among users, and 42.8% and 45.1% among non-users. The adjusted odds of hospital delivery were also high, 2.0 (95% CI: 1.7-2.4) in BDHS 2014 and 1.5 (95% CI: 1.3-1.8) in BDHS 2017-18. Women with history of using mobile phones for pregnancy-related causes were more likely to utilize at least 4 ANC visits and deliver in health facilities, however, most women were not using mobile phones for that.

Identifiers

PMID37022996
PMCPMC10079009
OpenAlexW4362657542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.