Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37022911›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin2023

Review of Major Social Determinants of Health in Schizophrenia-Spectrum Disorders: II. Assessments.

Emily T Sturm, Michael L Thomas, Anastasia G Sares, Subodh Dave, David Baron, Michael T Compton, Barton W Palmer, Dylan J Jester, Dilip V Jeste

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Schizophrenia: A Review of Social Risk Factors That Affect Women.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Emily T SturmDepartment of Psychology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Michael L ThomasDepartment of Psychology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Anastasia G SaresDepartment of Psychology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Subodh DaveRoyal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK.
David BaronWestern University of Health Sciences, CA, USA.
Michael T ComptonDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, and New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA.
Barton W PalmerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7618-3144
Dylan J JesterDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
Dilip V JesteDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA (Retired).

Funding

FELLOWSHIP IN GERIATRIC MENTAL HEALTHT32MH019934 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Elizabeth W Twamley · 1994 to 2026
$9.5M
Loneliness in Aging with SchizophreniaR01MH120201 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI PALMER, BARTON W. · 2020 to 2024
$3.9M
An Adaptive Testing Platform for Optimizing RDoC Experimental Cognitive MeasuresR01MH121546 · NIMH · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI THOMAS, MICHAEL L · 2020 to 2024
$2.6M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH120201NIMH NIH HHS R01MH120201NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH121546NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH019934
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsSocial determinants of health (SDoHs) impact the development and course of schizophrenia-spectrum psychotic disorders (SSPDs). Yet, we found no published scholarly reviews of psychometric properties and pragmatic utility of SDoH assessments among people with SSPDs. We aim to review those aspects of SDoH assessments. STUDY

designPsychInfo, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases were examined to obtain data on reliability, validity, administration process, strengths, and limitations of the measures for SDoHs identified in a paired scoping review. STUDY

resultsSDoHs were assessed using different approaches including self-reports, interviews, rating scales, and review of public databases. Of the major SDoHs, early-life adversities, social disconnection, racism, social fragmentation, and food insecurity had measures with satisfactory psychometric properties. Internal consistency reliabilities-evaluated in the general population for 13 measures of early-life adversities, social disconnection, racism, social fragmentation, and food insecurity-ranged from poor to excellent (0.68-0.96). The number of items varied from 1 to more than 100 and administration time ranged from less than 5 minutes to over an hour. Measures of urbanicity, low socioeconomic status, immigration status, homelessness/housing instability, and incarceration were based on public records or targeted sampling.

conclusionsAlthough the reported assessments of SDoHs show promise, there is a need to develop and test brief but validated screening measures suitable for clinical application. Novel assessment tools, including objective assessments at individual and community levels utilizing new technology, and sophisticated psychometric evaluations for reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change with effective interventions are recommended, and suggestions for training curricula are offered.

Indexed as

Psychotic DisordersRacismSchizophreniaHumansReproducibility of ResultsSocial Determinants of Healthearly-life adversityfood insecurityracismsocial connectionssocioeconomic status

Identifiers

PMID37022911
PMCPMC10318889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.