Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37022717›Full record

ArticleJAMA ophthalmology2023

Efficacy and Safety of a Water-Free Topical Cyclosporine, 0.1%, Solution for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Dry Eye Disease: The ESSENCE-2 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Esen K Akpek, David L Wirta, Johnathon E Downing, Joseph Tauber, John D Sheppard, Joseph B Ciolino, Alice S Meides, Sonja Krösser

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04523129 (A Phase 3, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-masked, Vehicle-controlled Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Topical CyclASol® for the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04523129 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-masked, Vehicle-controlled Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Topical CyclASol® for the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorNovaliq GmbHRan2020 to 2021Enrolled834ConditionsDry Eye DiseaseArmsCyclASol topical ocular, eye drops, Vehicle topical ocular, eye drops
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Pooled results from two pivotal randomized controlled clinical trials: ESSENCE-1 and ESSENCE-2 to assess efficacy and safety of a water-free ciclosporin 0.1% formulation for the treatment of dry eye disease.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Nanotechnology-Based Treatment for Ophthalmic Diseases.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Diagnostic methods for managing dry eyes.World journal of methodology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Esen K AkpekThe Wilmer Eye Institute, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
David L WirtaEye Research Foundation, Newport Beach, California.
Johnathon E DowningPremier Practice Management, Los Angeles, California.
Joseph TauberTauber Eye Center, Kansas City, Missouri.
John D SheppardVirginia Eye Consultants, Norfolk.
Joseph B CiolinoMassachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary/Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Alice S MeidesNovaliq GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sonja KrösserNovaliq GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Dry eye disease (DED) is a common public health problem with significant impact on vision-related quality of life and well-being of patients. Medications with rapid onset of action and a good tolerability profile remain an unmet need. Objective: To assess efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a water-free cyclosporine ophthalmic solution, 0.1% (CyclASol [Novaliq GmbH]), applied twice daily in DED compared with vehicle. Design, Setting, and Participants: CyclASol for the Treatment of Signs and Symptoms of Dry Eye Disease (ESSENCE-2) was a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, vehicle-controlled clinical study conducted from December 5, 2020, to October 8, 2021. Following a 14-day run-in period with an artificial tear administered 2 times per day, eligible participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to the treatment groups. Patients with moderate to severe DED were included in the study. Interventions: Cyclosporine solution vs vehicle administered 2 times per day for 29 days. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end points were changes from baseline in total corneal fluorescein staining (tCFS; 0-15 National Eye Institute scale) and in dryness score (0-100 visual analog scale) at day 29. Conjunctival staining, central corneal fluorescein staining, and tCFS responders were also assessed. Results: A total of 834 study participants were randomly assigned to cyclosporine (423 [50.7%]) or vehicle (411 [49.3%]) groups at 27 sites. Participants had a mean (SD) age of 57.1 (15.8) years, and 609 (73.0%) were female individuals. The majority of participants self-identified in the following race categories: 79 Asian (9.5 %), 108 Black (12.9%), and 635 White (76.1%). Participants treated with cyclosporine solution had greater improvement in tCFS (-4.0 grades) than the vehicle group (-3.6 grades) at day 29 (change [∆] = -0.4; 95% CI, -0.8 to 0; P = .03). The dryness score showed treatment benefits from baseline in both groups: -12.2 points for cyclosporine and -13.6 points for vehicle (∆ = 1.4; 95% CI, -1.8 to 4.6; P = .38). In the cyclosporine group, 293 participants (71.6%) achieved clinically meaningful reductions of 3 grades or higher in tCFS vs 236 (59.7%) in the vehicle group (∆ = 12.6%; 95% CI, 6.0%-19.3%; P < .001). These responders showed greater improvement in symptoms at day 29 including dryness (∆ = -4.6; 95% CI, -8.0 to -1.2; P = .007) and blurred vision (Δ = -3.5; 95% CI, -6.6 to -4.0; P = .03) compared with nonresponders. Conclusions and Relevance: The ESSENCE-2 trial confirmed that treatment with a water-free cyclosporine solution, 0.1%, results in early therapeutic effects on the ocular surface compared with vehicle. The responder analyses suggest that the effect is clinically meaningful in 71.6% of participants in the cyclosporine group. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04523129.

Indexed as

CyclosporineDry Eye SyndromesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFluoresceinHumansLubricant Eye DropsMaleMiddle AgedOphthalmic SolutionsQuality of LifeTearsTreatment OutcomeCyclosporineFluoresceinLubricant Eye DropsOphthalmic Solutions

Identifiers

PMID37022717
PMCPMC10080403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.