ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2023
Automatic Identification and Segmentation of Orbital Blowout Fractures Based on Artificial Intelligence.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence for fracture detection on computed tomography: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy in non-commercial and commercial solutions.Emergency radiology · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and prognosis of ocular trauma: a systematic review.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Pooled it
- Diagnostic performance of neural network algorithms in skull fracture detection on CT scans: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Emergency radiology · 2025Pooled it
- Orbital Defect Size Reflects Structural Displacement but Not Ocular Motor Dysfunction: A Cohort Study of 1084 Patients.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Deep Learning-Based Automated Segmentation and Multi-Parametric Quantitative Assessment of the Lacrimal Drainage System on CT-DCG.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- Automated orbital wall fracture detection and severity classification of ocular injuries using deep learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A Benchmark X-ray Dataset for Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures with Improved YOLOv11-Based Detection.Scientific data · 2026Article
- In Vivo Confocal Microscopy for Automated Detection of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: A Study Based on Deep Convolutional Neural Networks.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Assessing the accuracy of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and management of orbital fractures: Is this the future of surgical decision-making?JPRAS open · 2024Article
- Patient-specific implants for orbital fracture surgery.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The incidence of orbital blowout fractures (OBFs) is gradually increasing due to traffic accidents, sports injuries, and ocular trauma. Orbital computed tomography (CT) is crucial for accurate clinical diagnosis. In this study, we built an artificial intelligence (AI) system based on two available deep learning networks (DenseNet-169 and UNet) for fracture identification, fracture side distinguishment, and fracture area segmentation. Methods: We established a database of orbital CT images and manually annotated the fracture areas. DenseNet-169 was trained and evaluated on the identification of CT images with OBFs. We also trained and evaluated DenseNet-169 and UNet for fracture side distinguishment and fracture area segmentation. We used cross-validation to evaluate the performance of the AI algorithm after training. Results: For fracture identification, DenseNet-169 achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.9920 ± 0.0021, with an accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.9693 ± 0.0028, 0.9717 ± 0.0143, and 0.9596 ± 0.0330, respectively. DenseNet-169 realized the distinguishment of the fracture side with accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of 0.9859 ± 0.0059, 0.9743 ± 0.0101, 0.9980 ± 0.0041, and 0.9923 ± 0.0008, respectively. The intersection over union (IoU) and Dice coefficient of UNet for fracture area segmentation were 0.8180 ± 0.0093 and 0.8849 ± 0.0090, respectively, showing a high agreement with manual segmentation. Conclusions: The trained AI system could realize the automatic identification and segmentation of OBFs, which might be a new tool for smart diagnoses and improved efficiencies of three-dimensional (3D) printing-assisted surgical repair of OBFs. Translational Relevance: Our AI system, based on two available deep learning network models, could help in precise diagnoses and accurate surgical repairs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.