Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37022663›Full record

ReviewCurrent HIV/AIDS reports2023

Ethical Perspectives in Using Technology-Enabled Research for Key HIV Populations in Rights-Constrained Settings.

Lidia Flores, Sean D Young

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current HIV/AIDS reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lidia FloresDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Informatics, University of California, 333 W. City Blvd., Suite 640, IrvineIrvine, CA, 92868, USA.
Sean D YoungDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Informatics, University of California, 333 W. City Blvd., Suite 640, IrvineIrvine, CA, 92868, USA. syoung5@hs.uci.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6052-4875

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewPeople who use illicit drug substances (e.g., heroin) and sex workers are vulnerable to acquiring HIV. Due to the criminalization of illicit drug substances and sex work in many countries, these populations often reside in rights-constrained settings where their well-being, freedom, and access to HIV prevention and care services may be compromised due to legal prosecutions and societal stigma. RECENT

findingsThis study conducted a literature review on papers that evaluated a combination of the following three components: ethics, technology-based research, and populations who use drug substances and/or sex workers. We explored research on these ethical perspectives from both key populations and researchers. Findings revealed potential risks in data security and possible harmful implications of compromised data within these rights-constrained settings. Best practices were explored within the literature to identify potential methods for addressing these ethical concerns and improving HIV prevention and care.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsIllicit DrugsSex WorkersHumansSex WorkSocial StigmaIllicit DrugsAppsEthicsIllicit substanceRights-constrainedSex workSocial media

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.