ArticleJournal of cardiovascular translational research2024
Negative Impact of Acute Reloading after Mechanical Left Ventricular Unloading.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular translational research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiac rehabilitation in porcine models: Advances in therapeutic strategies for ischemic heart disease.Zoological research · 2025Review
- Reduction of left ventricular diastolic pressure as a key regulator of infarct coronary flow under mechanical left ventricular support.The Journal of physiology · 2024Article
- A case of ECPELLA-supported treatment for post-infarction cardiac rupture.Journal of cardiology cases · 2024Article
- Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock.Journal of intensive care · 2023Review
- Differential utilization of Impella devices, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and combined therapies as escalation and de-escalation strategies.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Mechanical LV unloading for acute myocardial infarction (MI) is a promising supportive therapy to reperfusion. However, no data is available on exit strategy. We evaluated hemodynamic and cellular effects of reloading after Impella-mediated LV unloading in Yorkshire pigs. First, we conducted an acute study in normal heart to observe effects of unloading and reloading independent of MI-induced ischemic effects. We then completed an MI study to investigate optimal exit strategy on one-week infarct size, no-reflow area, and LV function with different reloading speeds. Initial studies showed that acute reloading causes an immediate rise in end-diastolic wall stress followed by a significant increase in cardiomyocyte apoptosis. The MI study did not result in any statistically significant findings; however, numerically smaller average infarct size and no-reflow area in the gradual reloading group prompt further examination of reloading approach as an important clinically relevant consideration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.