Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37022609›Full record

SynthesisObesity surgery2023

One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) with a 150-cm Biliopancreatic Limb (BPL) Versus a 200-cm BPL, a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Mohamed AbdAlla Salman, Ahmed Salman, Mohamed Moustafa Assal, Mohammed Elsherbiney, Mohamed Tourky, Ahmed Elewa, Adel Mohamed Khalaf, Mohamed A Gadallah, Mahmoud Gebril, Sadaf Khalid and 4 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Obesity surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Mohamed AbdAlla SalmanKasrAlainy School of Medicine, Cairo, Egypt. Mohammed.salman@kasralainy.edu.eg.ORCID 0000-0001-5445-6415
Ahmed SalmanKasrAlainy School of Medicine, Cairo, Egypt.
Mohamed Moustafa AssalUniversity Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust, Poole, UK.
Mohammed ElsherbineyUnited Lincolnshire NHS Trust, Lincoln, UK.
Mohamed TourkyGreat Western Hospitals, Swindon, UK.
Ahmed ElewaNational Hepatology and Tropical Medicine Research Institute, Cairo, Egypt.
Adel Mohamed KhalafAl_Azhar university, Assuit branch, Assuit, Egypt.
Mohamed A GadallahAl_Azhar university, Assuit branch, Assuit, Egypt.
Mahmoud GebrilGlangwill General Hospital, Carmarthen, Wales, UK.
Sadaf KhalidRoyal Free London Hospital, NHS, London, UK.
Hossam ShaabanNorth Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust, Cumberland Infirmary Hospital, Carlisle, UK.
Aboalgasim Alamin MohammedNorth Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust, Cumberland Infirmary Hospital, Carlisle, UK.
Mohamed Hosny Abdo OsmanNorth Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust, Cumberland Infirmary Hospital, Carlisle, UK.
Haitham HassanKasrAlainy School of Medicine, Cairo, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This is a systematic review and meta-analysis that assessed the impact of performing OAGB with a 150-cm BPL versus a 200-cm BPL concerning weight loss, comorbidities remission, and adverse nutritional effects. The analysis included studies that compared patients who underwent OAGB with a 150-cm BPL and 200-cm BPL. Eight studies were eligible for this review after searching in the EMBASE, PubMed central database, and Google scholar. The pooled analysis revealed favoring the 200-cm BPL limb length for weight loss, with a highly significant difference in the TWL% (p=0.009). Both groups showed comparable comorbidities remission. Significantly higher ferritin and folate deficiency rates were found in the 200-cm BPL group. Considering a 200-cm BPL when performing OAGB delivers a better weight loss outcome than a 150-cm BPL, which is at the expense of a more severe nutritional deficiency. No significant differences were found regarding the comorbidities' remission.

Indexed as

Gastric BypassObesity, MorbidProtein-Energy MalnutritionComorbidityHumansRetrospective StudiesWeight Loss150 cm200 cmBiliopancreatic limb lengthObesityOne anastomosis gastric bypass

Identifiers

PMID37022609
PMCPMC10234867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.