ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2023
Utility of an Artificial Intelligence Enabled Electrocardiogram for Risk Assessment in Liver Transplant Candidates.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- AI Trustworthiness in the Perioperative Period for Patients with Serious Illness: Scoping Narrative Review.JMIR perioperative medicine · 2026Article
- Revolutionizing Cardiology through Artificial Intelligence-Big Data from Proactive Prevention to Precise Diagnostics and Cutting-Edge Treatment-A Comprehensive Review of the Past 5 Years.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Role of Artificial Intelligence in Surgical Decision-Making: A Comprehensive Review.Galen medical journal · 2024Review
- What Else Can AI See in a Digital ECG?Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPost-operative cardiac complications occur infrequently but contribute to mortality after liver transplantation (LT). Artificial intelligence-based algorithms based on electrocardiogram (AI-ECG) are attractive for use during pre-operative evaluation to screen for risk of post-operative cardiac complications, but their use for this purpose is unknown.
aimsThe aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of an AI-ECG algorithm in predicting cardiac factors such as asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction or potential for developing post-operative atrial fibrillation (AF) in cohorts of patients with end-stage liver disease either undergoing evaluation for transplant or receiving a liver transplant.
methodsA retrospective study was performed in two consecutive adult cohorts of patients who were either evaluated for LT or underwent LT at a single center between 2017 and 2019. ECG were analyzed using an AI-ECG trained to recognize patterns from a standard 12-lead ECG which could identify the presence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVEF < 50%) or subsequent atrial fibrillation.
resultsThe performance of AI-ECG in patients undergoing LT evaluation is similar to that in a general population but was lower in the presence of prolonged QTc. AI-ECG analysis on ECG in sinus rhythm had an AUROC of 0.69 for prediction of de novo post-transplant AF. Although post-transplant cardiac dysfunction occurred in only 2.3% of patients in the study cohorts, AI-ECG had an AUROC of 0.69 for prediction of subsequent low left ventricular ejection fraction.
conclusionsA positive screen for low EF or AF on AI-ECG can alert to risk of post-operative cardiac dysfunction or predict new onset atrial fibrillation after LT. The use of an AI-ECG can be a useful adjunct in persons undergoing transplant evaluation that can be readily implemented in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.