Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37022564›Full record

ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2023

Algorithms to Identify Nonmedical Opioid Use.

Kimberley C Brondeel, Kevin T Malone, Frederick R Ditmars, Bridget A Vories, Shahab Ahmadzadeh, Sridhar Tirumala, Charles J Fox, Sahar Shekoohi, Elyse M Cornett, Alan D Kaye

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kimberley C BrondeelUniversity of Texas Medical Branch, University of Texas, 301 University Blvd, 77555, Galveston, TX, USA.
Kevin T MaloneSchool of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, LA, 71103, Shreveport, USA.
Frederick R DitmarsUniversity of Texas Medical Branch, University of Texas, 301 University Blvd, 77555, Galveston, TX, USA.
Bridget A VoriesUniversity of Texas Medical Branch, University of Texas, 301 University Blvd, 77555, Galveston, TX, USA.
Shahab AhmadzadehDepartment of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA.
Sridhar TirumalaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA.
Charles J FoxDepartment of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA.
Sahar ShekoohiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA. sahar.shekoohi@lsuhs.edu.
Elyse M CornettDepartment of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA.
Alan D KayeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rise in nonmedical opioid overdoses over the last two decades necessitates improved detection technologies. Manual opioid screening exams can exhibit excellent sensitivity for identifying the risk of opioid misuse but can be time-consuming. Algorithms can help doctors identify at-risk people. In the past, electronic health record (EHR)-based neural networks outperformed Drug Abuse Manual Screenings in sparse studies; however, recent data shows that it may perform as well or less than manual screenings. Herein, a discussion of several different manual screenings and recommendations is contained, along with suggestions for practice. A multi-algorithm approach using EHR yielded strong predictive values of opioid use disorder (OUD) over a large sample size. A POR (Proove Opiate Risk) algorithm provided a high sensitivity for categorizing the risk of opioid abuse within a small sample size. All established screening methods and algorithms reflected high sensitivity and positive predictive values. Neural networks based on EHR also showed significant effectiveness when corroborated with Drug Abuse Manual Screenings. This review highlights the potential of algorithms for reducing provider costs and improving the quality of care by identifying nonmedical opioid use (NMOU) and OUD. These tools can be combined with traditional clinical interviewing, and neural networks can be further refined while expanding EHR.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidOpioid-Related DisordersAlgorithmsHumansPredictive Value of TestsSubstance Abuse DetectionAnalgesics, OpioidAlgorithmDrug abuseDrug abuse predictionDrug addictionOpioid abuse

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.