Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37022558›Full record

ReviewJournal of robotic surgery2023

No prostate? No problem: robotic inguinal hernia repair after prostatectomy.

Caleb Lade, Hunter Ford, Kiran Venincasa, Samara Lewis, Benjamin Lee, Allison Harmon, Preston Choi, Alexander Raines

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of robotic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. From hands to handles: a modern duel between laparoscopic TEP and robotic TAPP.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Caleb LadeDepartment of General Surgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA. caleb.lade@rebelmedicine.com.
Hunter FordDepartment of General Surgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Kiran VenincasaDepartment of General Surgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Samara LewisDepartment of General Surgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Benjamin LeeDepartment of General Surgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Allison HarmonDepartment of General Surgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Preston ChoiDepartment of General Surgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Alexander RainesDepartment of General Surgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional teaching suggests that prior pelvic operations, including prostatectomy, are a contraindication to laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Despite the growing use of robotic platforms in inguinal hernia repair, there are few studies describing robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repairs (RIHR) in this patient population. This study aims to demonstrate that RIHR is safe and effective in repairing inguinal hernias in patients who had previously undergone prostatectomy. We retrospectively reviewed RIHR cases performed from March 2017 to October 2021 by a single surgeon at our university-affiliated community hospital. Cases were reviewed for preoperative considerations, operative times and complications, and postoperative outcomes. A total of 30 patients with prior prostatectomy underwent transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) RIHR with mesh. Sixteen of the 30 patients had undergone robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP), while 14 patients underwent open resection. Seven of the patients had received post-resection radiation and 12 had previous non-urologic abdominal operations. When compared to all RIHRs performed over the same period, duration of surgery was increased. There were no conversions to open surgery. Postoperatively, one patient developed a repair site seroma which resolved after 1 month. Mean follow-up time was 8.0 months. At follow-up, one patient reported experiencing intermittent non-debilitating pain at the repair site and one patient developed an inguinoscrotal abscess of unknown relation to the repair. No patients reported hernia recurrences nor mesh infection. This review suggests that TAPP RIHR can be a safe and effective approach to inguinal hernia repair in patients who have previously undergone prostatectomy, including those who received radiation and those who underwent either open or robotic resections.

Indexed as

Hernia, InguinalLaparoscopyRoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresHerniorrhaphyHumansMaleProstatectomyRetrospective StudiesSurgical MeshTreatment OutcomeInguinal hernia repairMinimally invasive surgeryProstatectomyRIHRRobot-assisted laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairTAPPTransabdominal preperitoneal

Identifiers

PMID37022558
PMCPMC10078048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.