Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37022538›Full record

ReviewFunctional & integrative genomics2023

An overview of genome engineering in plants, including its scope, technologies, progress and grand challenges.

Muhammad Sufyan, Umar Daraz, Sajjad Hyder, Usman Zulfiqar, Rashid Iqbal, Sayed M Eldin, Farzana Rafiq, Naveed Mahmood, Khurram Shahzad, Muhammad Uzair and 2 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Functional & integrative genomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Wheat's Up with CRISPR-Cas-Current Advances, Obstacles and Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Smart agriculture in Asia.Plant communications · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. OvercomingACS omega · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Muhammad SufyanCollege of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100083, China.
Umar DarazState Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-Ecosystems, Center for Grassland Microbiome, College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Sajjad HyderDepartment of Botant, Government College Women University, Sialkot, Pakistan.
Usman ZulfiqarDepartment of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, 63100, Pakistan.
Rashid IqbalDepartment of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, 63100, Pakistan. rashid.iqbal@iub.edu.pk.
Sayed M EldinCenter of Research, Faculty of Engineering, Future University in Egypt, New Cairo, 11835, Egypt.
Farzana RafiqSchool of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, NCEPU, Beijing, China.
Naveed MahmoodCollege of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100083, China.
Khurram ShahzadInstitute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing, China.
Muhammad UzairNational Institute for Genomics and Advanced Biotechnology, Park Road, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Sajid FiazDepartment of Plant Breeding and Genetics, The University of Haripur, Haripur, 22620, Pakistan.
Iftikhar AliCenter for Plant Sciences and Biodiversity, University of Swat, Charbagh, 19120, Pakistan. iftikharali@uswat.edu.pk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome editing is a useful, adaptable, and favored technique for both functional genomics and crop enhancement. Over the years, rapidly evolving genome editing technologies, including clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated protein (CRISPR/Cas), transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), and zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), have shown broad application prospects in gene function research and improvement of critical agronomic traits in many crops. These technologies have also opened up opportunities for plant breeding. These techniques provide excellent chances for the quick modification of crops and the advancement of plant science in the future. The current review describes various genome editing techniques and how they function, particularly CRISPR/Cas9 systems, which can contribute significantly to the most accurate characterization of genomic rearrangement and plant gene functions as well as the enhancement of critical traits in field crops. To accelerate the use of gene-editing technologies for crop enhancement, the speed editing strategy of gene-family members was designed. As it permits genome editing in numerous biological systems, the CRISPR technology provides a valuable edge in this regard that particularly captures the attention of scientists.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGenetic EngineeringCrops, AgriculturalGenome, PlantPlant BreedingPlants, Genetically ModifiedTechnologyCRISPR/Cas9Crop improvementGenetic engineeringGenome editingPlants

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.