Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37022481›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurology2023

Update on the diagnosis and treatment of neuromyelits optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) - revised recommendations of the Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS). Part I: Diagnosis and differential diagnosis.

Sven Jarius, Orhan Aktas, Ilya Ayzenberg, Judith Bellmann-Strobl, Achim Berthele, Katrin Giglhuber, Vivien Häußler, Joachim Havla, Kerstin Hellwig, Martin W Hümmert and 14 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
102citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

102 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Intractable hiccups as a brainstem red flag: demyelinating disorders with emphasis on neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and area postrema syndrome.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Sven JariusMolecular Neuroimmunology Group, Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. sven.jarius@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Orhan AktasDepartment of Neurology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Ilya AyzenbergDepartment of Neurology, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Judith Bellmann-StroblDepartment of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Achim BertheleDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Katrin GiglhuberDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Vivien HäußlerDepartment of Neurology and Institute of Neuroimmunology and MS (INIMS), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Joachim HavlaInstitute of Clinical Neuroimmunology, LMU Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Kerstin HellwigDepartment of Neurology, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Martin W HümmertDepartment of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Ingo KleiterDepartment of Neurology, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Luisa KlotzDepartment of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Markus KrumbholzDepartment of Neurology and Pain Treatment, Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, University Hospital of the Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Rüdersdorf bei Berlin, Germany.
Tania KümpfelInstitute of Clinical Neuroimmunology, LMU Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Friedemann PaulDepartment of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Marius RingelsteinDepartment of Neurology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Klemens RuprechtDepartment of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Makbule SenelDepartment of Neurology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Jan-Patrick StellmannDepartment of Neurology and Institute of Neuroimmunology and MS (INIMS), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Florian Then BerghDepartment of Neurology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Hayrettin TumaniDepartment of Neurology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Brigitte WildemannMolecular Neuroimmunology Group, Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Corinna TrebstDepartment of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. trebst.corinna@mh-hannover.de.
Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The term 'neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders' (NMOSD) is used as an umbrella term that refers to aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G (AQP4-IgG)-positive neuromyelitis optica (NMO) and its formes frustes and to a number of closely related clinical syndromes without AQP4-IgG. NMOSD were originally considered subvariants of multiple sclerosis (MS) but are now widely recognized as disorders in their own right that are distinct from MS with regard to immunopathogenesis, clinical presentation, optimum treatment, and prognosis. In part 1 of this two-part article series, which ties in with our 2014 recommendations, the neuromyelitis optica study group (NEMOS) gives updated recommendations on the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of NMOSD. A key focus is on differentiating NMOSD from MS and from myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated encephalomyelitis (MOG-EM; also termed MOG antibody-associated disease, MOGAD), which shares significant similarity with NMOSD with regard to clinical and, partly, radiological presentation, but is a pathogenetically distinct disease. In part 2, we provide updated recommendations on the treatment of NMOSD, covering all newly approved drugs as well as established treatment options.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisNeuromyelitis OpticaAquaporin 4AutoantibodiesDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansImmunoglobulin GMyelin-Oligodendrocyte GlycoproteinAquaporin 4AutoantibodiesImmunoglobulin GMyelin-Oligodendrocyte GlycoproteinAquaporin-4 (AQP4)AutoantibodiesCerebrospinal fluid (CSF)Clinical presentationDiagnosisDiagnostic criteriaDifferential diagnosisMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)MOG antibody-associated disease (MOGAD)MOG antibody-associated encephalomyelitis (MOG-EM)Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)MyelitisNeuromyelitis optica (NMO)Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD)Optic coherence tomography (OCT)Optic neuritisSerology

Identifiers

PMID37022481
PMCPMC10267280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.