ArticleUnited European gastroenterology journal2023
A portrait of Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound training programs in Europe: Current practices and opportunities for improvement.
Article in United European gastroenterology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnosing Solid Lesions in the Pancreas With Multimodal Artificial Intelligence: A Randomized Crossover Trial.JAMA network open · 2024Trial
- The Learning Curve of Junior Endoscopists in EUS-Guided Gastroenterostomy With the Wireless Simplified Technique: A Prospective Study.United European gastroenterology journal · 2026Article
- Harmonising Gastroenterology Training: An Analysis of Gastroenterology Training Curricula of the United European Gastroenterology Member Societies.United European gastroenterology journal · 2025Observational
- Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography training conditions, results from a pan-European survey: Between vision and reality.United European gastroenterology journal · 2025Article
- Vade Mecum in ERCP, a roadmap to success: Tips from experts for excelling in ERCP.Endoscopy international open · 2024Article
- Saliva stress biomarkers in ERCP trainees before and after familiarisation with ERCP on a virtual simulator.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Article
- Young GI angle: Subspecialising in gastroenterology: Needs, challenges and opportunities.United European gastroenterology journal · 2023Article
- EUS and ERCP training in Europe: Time for simulation, optimization, and standardization.United European gastroenterology journal · 2023Article
- A portrait of Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound training programs in Europe: Current practices and opportunities for improvement.United European gastroenterology journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and EUS are challenging procedures requiring a high level of expertise to provide effective and safe patient care. Thus, high-quality training is needed to achieve competence. We aimed to evaluate the status of European ERCP/EUS training programs, to evaluate adherence to international recommendations, and to propose possible solutions for future improvements.
methodsA web-based survey was developed and ERCP/EUS experts and trainees across Europe were invited to participate.
resultsForty-one experts (out of 50; 82%) and 30 trainees (out of 70; 42.9%) from 18 countries answered the questionnaire. The training program application process is mainly driven by individual requests (87.8%). All surveyed departments offer combined ERCP/EUS training and the majority have adequate facilities and trainers. Although centers are high-volume and provide long-term fellowships, trainee hands-on exposure is not very high (43% expect to do (or did) 100-150 ERCPs and 69% up to 150 EUSs). A formal curriculum is in place in 53.7% centers, including simulation-training in 27.3%. Competence is assessed in 65.7% of centers, but validated tools are applied in only 33.3%.
conclusionsThis survey first provides an overview of ERCP/EUS training programs across Europe. It shows that there is adherence to international guidelines to a certain degree, but several gaps in the application process, use of simulators for training, training curriculum and assessment of performance have been recognized. Overcoming these shortcomings could serve as a basis for further improvement in ERCP/EUS training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.