Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37022154›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2023

Impact of Intestinal Microbiota on Growth Performance of Suckling and Weaned Piglets.

Md Rayhan Mahmud, Ching Jian, Md Karim Uddin, Mirja Huhtinen, Anne Salonen, Olli Peltoniemi, Heli Venhoranta, Claudio Oliviero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Great Bustard (Ecology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. DietaryFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  10. Effect of supplementing aBioscience of microbiota, food and health · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Md Rayhan Mahmud *Department of Production Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-7903-8014
Ching Jian *Human Microbiome Research Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-0577-8834
Md Karim UddinDepartment of Production Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-4328-3920
Mirja HuhtinenOrion Corporation, Orion Pharma, R&D, Espoo, Finland.
Anne SalonenHuman Microbiome Research Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-6960-7447
Olli PeltoniemiDepartment of Production Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-9481-1837
Heli Venhoranta *Department of Production Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Claudio Oliviero *Department of Production Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-8910-9595

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small-scale studies investigating the relationship between pigs' intestinal microbiota and growth performance have generated inconsistent results. We hypothesized that on farms under favorable environmental conditions (e.g., promoting sow nest-building behavior, high colostrum production, low incidence of diseases and minimal use of antimicrobials), the piglet gut microbiota may develop toward a population that promotes growth and reduces pathogenic bacteria. Using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, we sampled and profiled the fecal microbiota from 170 individual piglets throughout suckling and postweaning periods (in total 670 samples) to track gut microbiota development and its potential association with growth. During the suckling period, the dominant genera were

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsBacteriaFecesFemaleRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSwineWeaningRNA, Ribosomal, 16Sfiber degrading bacteriagrowthgut microbiotaNGS sequencingpigSCFAweaning

Identifiers

PMID37022154
PMCPMC10269657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.