ArticleIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering2023
A Non-Linear Body Machine Interface for Controlling Assistive Robotic Arms.
Article in IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveBody machine interfaces (BoMIs) enable individuals with paralysis to achieve a greater measure of independence in daily activities by assisting the control of devices such as robotic manipulators. The first BoMIs relied on Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to extract a lower dimensional control space from information in voluntary movement signals. Despite its widespread use, PCA might not be suited for controlling devices with a large number of degrees of freedom, as because of PCs' orthonormality the variance explained by successive components drops sharply after the first.
methodsHere, we propose an alternative BoMI based on non-linear autoencoder (AE) networks that mapped arm kinematic signals into joint angles of a 4D virtual robotic manipulator. First, we performed a validation procedure that aimed at selecting an AE structure that would allow to distribute the input variance uniformly across the dimensions of the control space. Then, we assessed the users' proficiency practicing a 3D reaching task by operating the robot with the validated AE.
resultsAll participants managed to acquire an adequate level of skill when operating the 4D robot. Moreover, they retained the performance across two non-consecutive days of training.
conclusionWhile providing users with a fully continuous control of the robot, the entirely unsupervised nature of our approach makes it ideal for applications in a clinical context since it can be tailored to each user's residual movements. SIGNIFICANCE: We consider these findings as supporting a future implementation of our interface as an assistive tool for people with motor impairments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.