Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37021812›Full record

SynthesisEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2023

Role of oesophageal cooling in the prevention of oesophageal injury in atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Mohamed Hamed, Sheref A Elseidy, Mohamed Abdelazeem, Ramez Morcos, Ahmed Abdallah, Yasser Sammour, Amr F Barakat, Wissam Khalife, Vijay Ramu, Mamas A Mamas and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. How to ablate the septo-pulmonary bundle: a case-based review of percutaneous ablation strategies to achieve roof line block.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  7. Role of oesophageal cooling in the prevention of oesophageal injury in atrial fibrillation catheter ablation.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  8. Letter to the editor: oesophageal cooling for protection during left atrial ablations.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohamed HamedDepartment of Internal Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, 777 Glades Road BC-71, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2010-0394
Sheref A ElseidyDepartment of Internal Medicine, Rochester General Hospital, 1425 Portland Ave, Rochester, NY 14621, USA.
Mohamed AbdelazeemDepartment of Internal Medicine, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, 736 Cambridge St, Brighton, MA 02135, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2663-9772
Ramez MorcosDivision of Cardiology, Florida Atlantic University, 777 Glades Road BC-71, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7234-6364
Ahmed AbdallahDivision of Cardiology, East Tennessee State University, 1276 Gilbreath Dr, Johnson City, TN 37614, USA.
Yasser SammourDivision of Cardiology, Houston Methodist Hospital, 6565 Fannin St, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1763-9340
Amr F BarakatUPMC Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh, 3550 Terrace St, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6859-4616
Wissam KhalifeDivision of Cardiology, University of Texas Medical Branch, 1302 Mechanic St, Galveston, TX 77550, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2234-3552
Vijay RamuDivision of Cardiology, East Tennessee State University, 1276 Gilbreath Dr, Johnson City, TN 37614, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9122-9318
Mamas A MamasKeele Cardiovascular Research Group, Keele University, Keele, Newcastle ST5 5BG, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9241-8890
Ayman ElbadawiDivision of Cardiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4248-781X
East Tennessee State University · USFlorida Atlantic University · USKeele University · GBMethodist Hospital · USRochester General Hospital · USSt. Elizabeth's Medical Center · USThe University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo evaluate the efficacy of oesophageal cooling in the prevention of oesophageal injury in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation. METHODS AND

resultsComprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases through April 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the role of oesophageal cooling compared with control in the prevention of oesophageal injury during AF catheter ablation. The study primary outcome was the incidence of any oesophageal injury. The meta-analysis included 4 RCTs with a total of 294 patients. There was no difference in the incidence of any oesophageal injury between oesophageal cooling and control [15% vs. 19%; relative risk (RR) 0.86; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31-2.41]. Compared with control, oesophageal cooling showed lower risk of severe oesophageal injury (1.5% vs. 9%; RR 0.21; 95% CI 0.05-0.80). There were no significant differences among the two groups in mild to moderate oesophageal injury (13.6% vs. 12.1%; RR 1.09; 95% CI 0.28-4.23), procedure duration [standardized mean difference (SMD) -0.03; 95% CI -0.36-0.30], posterior wall radiofrequency (RF) time (SMD 0.27; 95% CI -0.04-0.58), total RF time (SMD -0.50; 95% CI -1.15-0.16), acute reconnection incidence (RR 0.93; 95% CI 0.02-36.34), and ablation index (SMD 0.16; 95% CI -0.33-0.66).

conclusionAmong patients undergoing AF catheter ablation, oesophageal cooling did not reduce the overall risk of any oesophageal injury compared with control. Oesophageal cooling might shift the severity of oesophageal injuries to less severe injuries. Further studies should evaluate the long-term effects after oesophageal cooling during AF catheter ablation.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCatheter AblationEsophageal DiseasesHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAtrial fibrillationCatheter ablationOesophageal coolingOesophageal injuryRadiofrequency ablation

Identifiers

PMID37021812
PMCPMC10227763
OpenAlexW4362658073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.