ArticleSleep2023
A novel machine learning system for identifying sleep-wake states in mice.
Article in Sleep, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rotator cuff injury disrupts sleep architecture in mice and exhibits a light-dark phase-dependent pattern.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based prediction of ventilator therapeutic pressure for optimized CPAP titration.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Heart rate and sleep history encode ultradian REM sleep timing.Current biology : CB · 2026Article
- MLS-Net: An Automatic Sleep Stage Classifier Utilizing Multimodal Physiological Signals in Mice.Biosensors · 2024Article
- Article
- Sleep-Deep-Learner is taught sleep-wake scoring by the end-user to complete each record in their style.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2024Article
- Sleep-Deep-Net learns sleep wake scoring from the end-user and completes each record in their style.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Research into sleep-wake behaviors relies on scoring sleep states, normally done by manual inspection of electroencephalogram (EEG) and electromyogram (EMG) recordings. This is a highly time-consuming process prone to inter-rater variability. When studying relationships between sleep and motor function, analyzing arousal states under a four-state system of active wake (AW), quiet wake (QW), nonrapid-eye-movement (NREM) sleep, and rapid-eye-movement (REM) sleep provides greater precision in behavioral analysis but is a more complex model for classification than the traditional three-state identification (wake, NREM, and REM sleep) usually used in rodent models. Characteristic features between sleep-wake states provide potential for the use of machine learning to automate classification. Here, we devised SleepEns, which uses a novel ensemble architecture, the time-series ensemble. SleepEns achieved 90% accuracy to the source expert, which was statistically similar to the performance of two other human experts. Considering the capacity for classification disagreements that are still physiologically reasonable, SleepEns had an acceptable performance of 99% accuracy, as determined blindly by the source expert. Classifications given by SleepEns also maintained similar sleep-wake characteristics compared to expert classifications, some of which were essential for sleep-wake identification. Hence, our approach achieves results comparable to human ability in a fraction of the time. This new machine-learning ensemble will significantly impact the ability of sleep researcher to detect and study sleep-wake behaviors in mice and potentially in humans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.