Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37021707›Full record

ArticleMedical education online2023

Evaluation of a newly developed flipped-classroom course on interprofessional practice in health care for medical students.

Anita V Thomae, Lotte Verweij, Claudia M Witt, David Blum, Emanuel Feusi, André Fringer, Marion Huber, Melanie Roos, Jasmin Anita Lal, Rahel Naef

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical education online, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anita V ThomaeInstitute for Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7891-6121
Lotte VerweijInstitute for Implementation Science in Health Care, University of Zurich, Switzerland & Centre of Clinical Nursing Science, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Claudia M WittInstitute for Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
David BlumCompetence Center Palliative Care, Department of Radiooncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Emanuel FeusiInstitute of Public Health, School of Health Sciences, ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland.
André FringerInstitute of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Marion HuberInstitute of Public Health, School of Health Sciences, ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Melanie RoosFaculty of Medicine, Student Affairs, Curricula Development, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jasmin Anita LalFaculty of Medicine, Student Affairs, Curricula Development, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Rahel NaefInstitute for Implementation Science in Health Care, University of Zurich, Switzerland & Centre of Clinical Nursing Science, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interprofessional education is expected to promote collaborative practice and should therefore be included in health professionals' curricula. Reports on interprofessional curricular development and its evaluation are rare. We therefore undertook a comprehensive quantitative and qualitative evaluation of a new, mandatory course on interprofessional collaboration for medical students during their third year of the Bachelor of Medicine study programme. The newly developed and implemented course spans over six weeks and was designed in a hybrid, flipped-classroom format. It incorporates experience- and case-based learning as well as interactions with other health professionals. Each student completes an eLearning and a clinical workshadowing individually before attending the - due to the pandemic - virtual live lectures. To assess quality and usefulness of teaching-learning formats and course structure to learn about interprofessional collaboration and to develop interprofessional competencies and identity, a quantitative and qualitative evaluation was performed with more than 280 medical students and 26 nurse educators from teaching hospitals using online surveys (open & closed-ended format). Data were analyzed descriptively and using content analysis processes. Students appreciated the flipped-classroom concept, the real-world case-based learning scenarios with interprofessional lecturer teams, and the possibility of an experience-based learning opportunity in the clinical setting including interaction with students and professionals from other health professions. Interprofessional identity did not change during the course. Evaluation data showed that the course is a promising approach for teaching-learning interprofessional competencies to medical students. The evaluation revealed three factors that determined the success of this course, namely, a flipped-classroom concept, the individual workshadowing of medical students with another health professional, mainly nurses, and live sessions with interprofessional teaching-learning teams. The course structure and teaching-learning methods showed potential and could serve as a template for interprofessional course development in other institutions and on other course topics.

Indexed as

Students, MedicalCurriculumDelivery of Health CareHumansLearningProblem-Based Learningcourse developmentflipped classroomInterprofessional educationinterprofessional practicemedical students

Identifiers

PMID37021707
PMCPMC10081083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.