Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37021577›Full record

ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2023

Evaluation of Spatial Attentive Deep Learning for Automatic Placental Segmentation on Longitudinal MRI.

Yongkai Liu, Fatemeh Zabihollahy, Ran Yan, Brian Lee, Carla Janzen, Sherin U Devaskar, Kyunghyun Sung

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. CSAM: A 2.5D Cross-Slice Attention Module for Anisotropic Volumetric Medical Image Segmentation.IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision. IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yongkai LiuDepartment of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4478-4006
Fatemeh ZabihollahyDepartment of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Ran YanDepartment of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8204-8654
Brian LeeDepartment of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Carla JanzenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Sherin U DevaskarDepartment of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Kyunghyun SungDepartment of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4175-5322
University of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Imaging Innovations for Placental Assessment in Response to Environmental PollutionU01HD087221 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DEVASKAR, SHERIN U, JANZEN, CARLA · 2015 to 2015
$4.3M
Electrochemical Liquid Biopsy Assessing Placental HealthR01HD100015 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DEVASKAR, SHERIN U, WEI, FANG · 2019 to 2023
$3.2M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD100015NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD087221
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAutomated segmentation of the placenta by MRI in early pregnancy may help predict normal and aberrant placenta function, which could improve the efficiency of placental assessment and the prediction of pregnancy outcomes. An automated segmentation method that works at one gestational age may not transfer effectively to other gestational ages. PURPOSE: To evaluate a spatial attentive deep learning method (SADL) for automated placental segmentation on longitudinal placental MRI scans. STUDY TYPE: Prospective, single-center. SUBJECTS: A total of 154 pregnant women who underwent MRI scans at both 14-18 weeks of gestation and at 19-24 weeks of gestation, divided into training (N = 108), validation (N = 15), and independent testing datasets (N = 31). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: A 3 T, T2-weighted half Fourier single-shot turbo spin-echo (T2-HASTE) sequence. ASSESSMENT: The reference standard of placental segmentation was manual delineation on T2-HASTE by a third-year neonatology clinical fellow (B.L.) under the supervision of an experienced maternal-fetal medicine specialist (C.J. with 20 years of experience) and an MRI scientist (K.S. with 19 years of experience). STATISTICAL TESTS: The three-dimensional Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was used to measure the automated segmentation performance compared to the manual placental segmentation. A paired t-test was used to compare the DSCs between SADL and U-Net methods. A Bland-Altman plot was used to analyze the agreement between manual and automated placental volume measurements. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

resultsIn the testing dataset, SADL achieved average DSCs of 0.83 ± 0.06 and 0.84 ± 0.05 in the first and second MRI, which were significantly higher than those achieved by U-Net (0.77 ± 0.08 and 0.76 ± 0.10, respectively). A total of 6 out of 62 MRI scans (9.6%) had volume measurement differences between the SADL-based automated and manual volume measurements that were out of 95% limits of agreement. DATA

conclusionsSADL can automatically detect and segment the placenta with high performance in MRI at two different gestational ages. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.

Indexed as

Deep LearningFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingPlacentaPregnancyProspective Studiesautomated placental segmentationconvolutional neural networkspatial attentive deep learning

Identifiers

PMID37021577
PMCPMC10080136
OpenAlexW4292065576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.