ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2023
Evaluation of Spatial Attentive Deep Learning for Automatic Placental Segmentation on Longitudinal MRI.
Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent innovations in placental MRI: Integrating visualization and functional imaging.Placenta · 2026Review
- A deep learning algorithm for automatic 3D segmentation and classification of the sheep placenta in magnetic resonance images.Physiological reports · 2026Article
- Regional quantification of metabolic liver function using hyperpolarized [1-Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Radiomics of Axial and Sagittal Orientation in Pregnant Patients with Suspected Placenta Accreta Spectrum.Academic radiology · 2025Article
- To characterize small renal cell carcinoma using diffusion relaxation correlation spectroscopic imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient based histogram analysis: a preliminary study.La Radiologia medica · 2024Article
- MRI-based radiomic models to predict surgical margin status and infer tumor immune microenvironment in breast cancer patients with breast-conserving surgery: a multicenter validation study.European radiology · 2024Article
- CSAM: A 2.5D Cross-Slice Attention Module for Anisotropic Volumetric Medical Image Segmentation.IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision. IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision · 2024Article
- The human placenta project: Funded studies, imaging technologies, and future directions.Placenta · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAutomated segmentation of the placenta by MRI in early pregnancy may help predict normal and aberrant placenta function, which could improve the efficiency of placental assessment and the prediction of pregnancy outcomes. An automated segmentation method that works at one gestational age may not transfer effectively to other gestational ages. PURPOSE: To evaluate a spatial attentive deep learning method (SADL) for automated placental segmentation on longitudinal placental MRI scans. STUDY TYPE: Prospective, single-center. SUBJECTS: A total of 154 pregnant women who underwent MRI scans at both 14-18 weeks of gestation and at 19-24 weeks of gestation, divided into training (N = 108), validation (N = 15), and independent testing datasets (N = 31). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: A 3 T, T2-weighted half Fourier single-shot turbo spin-echo (T2-HASTE) sequence. ASSESSMENT: The reference standard of placental segmentation was manual delineation on T2-HASTE by a third-year neonatology clinical fellow (B.L.) under the supervision of an experienced maternal-fetal medicine specialist (C.J. with 20 years of experience) and an MRI scientist (K.S. with 19 years of experience). STATISTICAL TESTS: The three-dimensional Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was used to measure the automated segmentation performance compared to the manual placental segmentation. A paired t-test was used to compare the DSCs between SADL and U-Net methods. A Bland-Altman plot was used to analyze the agreement between manual and automated placental volume measurements. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
resultsIn the testing dataset, SADL achieved average DSCs of 0.83 ± 0.06 and 0.84 ± 0.05 in the first and second MRI, which were significantly higher than those achieved by U-Net (0.77 ± 0.08 and 0.76 ± 0.10, respectively). A total of 6 out of 62 MRI scans (9.6%) had volume measurement differences between the SADL-based automated and manual volume measurements that were out of 95% limits of agreement. DATA
conclusionsSADL can automatically detect and segment the placenta with high performance in MRI at two different gestational ages. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.