Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37021379›Full record

ArticleHERD2023

Designing a Child-, Family-, and Healthcare Provider-Centered Procedure Room in a Tertiary Care Children's Hospital.

Sasha Litwin, Lindsay Clarke, Jocelyne Copeland, Jennifer Tyrrell, Caleb Tait, Vina Mohabir, Fiona Campbell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HERD, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Reducing distress during vaccine injections: 2026 clinical practice guideline update.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sasha LitwinDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Hospital for Sick Children, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9145-6577
Lindsay ClarkeDesign and Improvement, Process Improvement and Innovation Team, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jocelyne CopelandFacilities Planning and Redevelopment Project Horizon, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jennifer TyrrellTransitional Pain Clinic, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Caleb TaitDepartment of Child Life, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Vina MohabirChild Health Evaluative Sciences, SickKids Research Institute, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Fiona CampbellDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe study aim was to co-design new pediatric procedure room prototypes with children, caregivers, and healthcare providers (HCPs).

backgroundMedical procedures can cause pain and anxiety for children and their families. If spaces are not designed for patients' needs, procedures may take longer, require sedation, and result in an inferior care experience. Involving HCPs in co-designing optimal spaces can result in more efficient and safer environments. co-designing spaces with patients and their families can inform psychologically safer and less traumatic environments.

methodsWe followed human-centered design methodology. Data were collected via semi-structured interviews, field observations, and two multidisciplinary design workshops with patients, caregivers, and HCPs. Themes from the data were extracted using a content analysis and used to make evidence-informed recommendations for design features.

resultsThe study took place from October 2021 to February 2022. Patients, families, and HCPs reported similar needs: (1) control over the environment, including the ability to adjust lighting, temperature, and sound; (2) space that supports patient privacy; (3) the use of evidence-based pain reduction and distraction methods; (4) attention to the sensory environment, including visual (light, color), tactile (textures of furniture and equipment), auditory, and olfactory stimuli; (5) human factors organization of the space and equipment; (6) accessible and equitable spatial design; and (7) the significance of the journey leading up to and after the procedure.

conclusionsIt is feasible to co-design procedure rooms that support evidence-based psychological, physical, and pharmacological interventions that are known to minimize pain for children.

Indexed as

AnxietyCaregiversFamilyHospitalsHumansPainTertiary Health Carechildren’s designschildren’s hospitalsfamily-centered careparticipatory designprocedure room

Identifiers

PMID37021379
PMCPMC10328143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.