Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37021319›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023

Plant mitochondrial introns as genetic markers - conservation and variation.

Melinda R Grosser, Samantha K Sites, Mayara M Murata, Yolanda Lopez, Karen C Chamusco, Kyra Love Harriage, Jude W Grosser, James H Graham, Fred G Gmitter, Christine D Chase

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Response of Pedunculate Oak (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  8. The complete mitochondrial genome ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Melinda R GrosserHorticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Samantha K SitesHorticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Mayara M MurataCitrus Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Lake Alfred, FL, United States.
Yolanda LopezAgronomy Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Karen C ChamuscoHorticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Kyra Love HarriageHorticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Jude W GrosserCitrus Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Lake Alfred, FL, United States.
James H GrahamCitrus Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Lake Alfred, FL, United States.
Fred G GmitterCitrus Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Lake Alfred, FL, United States.
Christine D ChaseHorticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
University of Florida · USFlorida Department of Citrus · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant genomes are comprised of nuclear, plastid and mitochondrial components characterized by different patterns of inheritance and evolution. Genetic markers from the three genomes provide complementary tools for investigations of inheritance, genetic relationships and phenotypic contributions. Plant mitochondrial genomes are challenging for universal marker development because they are highly variable in terms of size, gene order and intergenic sequences and highly conserved with respect to protein-coding sequences. PCR amplification of introns with primers that anneal to conserved, flanking exons is effective for the development of polymorphic nuclear genome markers. The potential for plant mitochondrial intron polymorphisms to distinguish between congeneric species or intraspecific varieties has not been systematically investigated and is possibly constrained by requirements for intron secondary structure and interactions with co-evolved organelle intron splicing factors. To explore the potential for broadly applicable plant mitochondrial intron markers, PCR primer sets based upon conserved sequences flanking 11 introns common to seven angiosperm species were tested across a range of plant orders. PCR-amplified introns were screened for indel polymorphisms among a group of cross-compatible

Indexed as

group II intronindel polymorphismorganelle genomePCR-based markersplant mitochondriasingle nucleotide polymorphism

Identifiers

PMID37021319
PMCPMC10067590
OpenAlexW4327979132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.