Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37021312›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023

Correction of UAV LiDAR-derived grassland canopy height based on scan angle.

Cong Xu, Dan Zhao, Zhaoju Zheng, Ping Zhao, Junhua Chen, Xiuwen Li, Xueming Zhao, Yujin Zhao, Wenjun Liu, Bingfang Wu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Cong XuState Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Dan ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Zhaoju ZhengState Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Ping ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Junhua ChenState Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xiuwen LiState Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xueming ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yujin ZhaoUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Wenjun LiuSchool of Ecology and Environmental Science, Yunnan University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Bingfang WuState Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yuan ZengState Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grassland canopy height is a crucial trait for indicating functional diversity or monitoring species diversity. Compared with traditional field sampling, light detection and ranging (LiDAR) provides new technology for mapping the regional grassland canopy height in a time-saving and cost-effective way. However, the grassland canopy height based on unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) LiDAR is usually underestimated with height information loss due to the complex structure of grassland and the relatively small size of individual plants. We developed canopy height correction methods based on scan angle to improve the accuracy of height estimation by compensating the loss of grassland height. Our method established the relationships between scan angle and two height loss indicators (height loss and height loss ratio) using the ground-measured canopy height of sample plots with 1×1m and LiDAR-derived heigh. We found that the height loss ratio considering the plant own height had a better performance (R

Indexed as

canopy heightgrasslandheight lossscan angleUAV lidar

Identifiers

PMID37021312
PMCPMC10067768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.